From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: David Miller Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 mlx5-next 0/2] Mellanox, mlx5 new device events Date: Fri, 01 Jun 2018 11:45:58 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <20180601.114558.569563972122502762.davem@davemloft.net> References: <20180530175950.9488-1-saeedm@mellanox.com> <20180531.153603.45475041396194381.davem@davemloft.net> <82ddad11b6a77aa07238ff50ae8769360bfb583b.camel@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: saeedm@mellanox.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org, leonro@mellanox.com, jgg@mellanox.com To: dledford@redhat.com Return-path: Received: from shards.monkeyblade.net ([184.105.139.130]:47662 "EHLO shards.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752043AbeFAPqC (ORCPT ); Fri, 1 Jun 2018 11:46:02 -0400 In-Reply-To: <82ddad11b6a77aa07238ff50ae8769360bfb583b.camel@redhat.com> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: From: Doug Ledford Date: Fri, 01 Jun 2018 11:08:24 -0400 > On Thu, 2018-05-31 at 15:36 -0400, David Miller wrote: >> From: Saeed Mahameed >> Date: Wed, 30 May 2018 10:59:48 -0700 >> >> > The following series is for mlx5-next tree [1], it adds the support of two >> > new device events, from Ilan Tayari: >> > >> > 1. High temperature warnings. >> > 2. FPGA QP error event. >> > >> > In case of no objection this series will be applied to mlx5-next tree >> > and will be sent later as a pull request to both rdma and net trees. >> > >> > [1] https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/mellanox/linux.git/log/?h=mlx5-next >> > >> > v1->v2: >> > - improve commit message of the FPGA QP error event patch. >> >> Series applied, thanks. > > Hi Dave, > > Although in this case it doesn't really matter and we can work around > it, this was supposed to be a case of the new methodology that Saeed and > Jason had worked out with you. Specifically, when Saeed says in the > cover letter: > >> In case of no objection this series will be applied to mlx5-next tree> >> and will be sent later as a pull request to both rdma and net trees. > > then it is intended for you to ack the original patch series, not apply > it, and when acks from both the net and rdma side have been received, > then we will get a pull request of just that series. Sorry, I saw your ACK and misinterpreted the situation. I'll be more careful next time.