public inbox for netdev@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
To: ast@kernel.org
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, jakub.kicinski@netronome.com,
	kafai@fb.com, songliubraving@fb.com, ldv@altlinux.org,
	esyr@redhat.com, Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Subject: [PATCH bpf] bpf: fix uapi hole for 32 bit compat applications
Date: Sat,  2 Jun 2018 05:21:59 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180602032159.21199-1-daniel@iogearbox.net> (raw)

In 64 bit, we have a 4 byte hole between ifindex and netns_dev in the
case of struct bpf_map_info but also struct bpf_prog_info. In net-next
commit b85fab0e67b ("bpf: Add gpl_compatible flag to struct bpf_prog_info")
added a bitfield into it to expose some flags related to programs. Thus,
add an unnamed __u32 bitfield for both so that alignment keeps the same
in both 32 and 64 bit cases, and can be naturally extended from there
as in b85fab0e67b.

Before:

  # file test.o
  test.o: ELF 32-bit LSB relocatable, Intel 80386, version 1 (SYSV), not stripped
  # pahole test.o
  struct bpf_map_info {
	__u32                      type;                 /*     0     4 */
	__u32                      id;                   /*     4     4 */
	__u32                      key_size;             /*     8     4 */
	__u32                      value_size;           /*    12     4 */
	__u32                      max_entries;          /*    16     4 */
	__u32                      map_flags;            /*    20     4 */
	char                       name[16];             /*    24    16 */
	__u32                      ifindex;              /*    40     4 */
	__u64                      netns_dev;            /*    44     8 */
	__u64                      netns_ino;            /*    52     8 */

	/* size: 64, cachelines: 1, members: 10 */
	/* padding: 4 */
  };

After (same as on 64 bit):

  # file test.o
  test.o: ELF 32-bit LSB relocatable, Intel 80386, version 1 (SYSV), not stripped
  # pahole test.o
  struct bpf_map_info {
	__u32                      type;                 /*     0     4 */
	__u32                      id;                   /*     4     4 */
	__u32                      key_size;             /*     8     4 */
	__u32                      value_size;           /*    12     4 */
	__u32                      max_entries;          /*    16     4 */
	__u32                      map_flags;            /*    20     4 */
	char                       name[16];             /*    24    16 */
	__u32                      ifindex;              /*    40     4 */

	/* XXX 4 bytes hole, try to pack */

	__u64                      netns_dev;            /*    48     8 */
	__u64                      netns_ino;            /*    56     8 */
	/* --- cacheline 1 boundary (64 bytes) --- */

	/* size: 64, cachelines: 1, members: 10 */
	/* sum members: 60, holes: 1, sum holes: 4 */
  };

Reported-by: Dmitry V. Levin <ldv@altlinux.org>
Reported-by: Eugene Syromiatnikov <esyr@redhat.com>
Fixes: 52775b33bb507 ("bpf: offload: report device information about offloaded maps")
Fixes: 675fc275a3a2d ("bpf: offload: report device information for offloaded programs")
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Acked-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
---
 include/uapi/linux/bpf.h       | 2 ++
 tools/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h | 2 ++
 2 files changed, 4 insertions(+)

diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h b/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h
index c5ec897..8c31773 100644
--- a/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h
+++ b/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h
@@ -1017,6 +1017,7 @@ struct bpf_prog_info {
 	__aligned_u64 map_ids;
 	char name[BPF_OBJ_NAME_LEN];
 	__u32 ifindex;
+	__u32 :32;
 	__u64 netns_dev;
 	__u64 netns_ino;
 } __attribute__((aligned(8)));
@@ -1030,6 +1031,7 @@ struct bpf_map_info {
 	__u32 map_flags;
 	char  name[BPF_OBJ_NAME_LEN];
 	__u32 ifindex;
+	__u32 :32;
 	__u64 netns_dev;
 	__u64 netns_ino;
 } __attribute__((aligned(8)));
diff --git a/tools/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h b/tools/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h
index c5ec897..8c31773 100644
--- a/tools/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h
+++ b/tools/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h
@@ -1017,6 +1017,7 @@ struct bpf_prog_info {
 	__aligned_u64 map_ids;
 	char name[BPF_OBJ_NAME_LEN];
 	__u32 ifindex;
+	__u32 :32;
 	__u64 netns_dev;
 	__u64 netns_ino;
 } __attribute__((aligned(8)));
@@ -1030,6 +1031,7 @@ struct bpf_map_info {
 	__u32 map_flags;
 	char  name[BPF_OBJ_NAME_LEN];
 	__u32 ifindex;
+	__u32 :32;
 	__u64 netns_dev;
 	__u64 netns_ino;
 } __attribute__((aligned(8)));
-- 
2.9.5

             reply	other threads:[~2018-06-02  3:22 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-06-02  3:21 Daniel Borkmann [this message]
2018-06-02  3:50 ` [PATCH bpf] bpf: fix uapi hole for 32 bit compat applications Alexei Starovoitov

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20180602032159.21199-1-daniel@iogearbox.net \
    --to=daniel@iogearbox.net \
    --cc=ast@kernel.org \
    --cc=esyr@redhat.com \
    --cc=jakub.kicinski@netronome.com \
    --cc=kafai@fb.com \
    --cc=ldv@altlinux.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=songliubraving@fb.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox