From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 0/2] mlxsw: Fixes in offloading of
 mirror-to-gretap
Date: Mon, 04 Jun 2018 15:34:29 -0400 (EDT)
Message-ID: <20180604.153429.111603014208301090.davem@davemloft.net>
References: <20180602180935.24544-1-idosch@mellanox.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, jiri@mellanox.com, petrm@mellanox.com,
        mlxsw@mellanox.com
To: idosch@mellanox.com
Return-path: <netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from shards.monkeyblade.net ([184.105.139.130]:51584 "EHLO
        shards.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
        with ESMTP id S1750915AbeFDTeb (ORCPT
        <rfc822;netdev@vger.kernel.org>); Mon, 4 Jun 2018 15:34:31 -0400
In-Reply-To: <20180602180935.24544-1-idosch@mellanox.com>
Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <netdev.vger.kernel.org>

From: Ido Schimmel <idosch@mellanox.com>
Date: Sat,  2 Jun 2018 21:09:33 +0300

> Petr says:
> 
> These two patches fix issues in offloading of mirror-to-gretap when
> bridge is present in the underlay.
> 
> In patch #1, reconsideration of SPAN configuration is not done right at
> the point that SWITCHDEV_OBJ_ID_PORT_VLAN deletion notification is
> distributed, but is postponed, because the notifications are actually
> distributed before the relevant change is implemented in the bridge.
> 
> In patch #2, a problem in configuring VLAN tagging in situations when a
> VLAN device is on top of an 802.1Q bridge whose egress port is marked as
> "egress untagged". In that case, mlxsw would neglect to suppress the
> tagging implicitly assumed after the VLAN device was seen.

Series applied, thank you.