From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: David Miller Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 0/6] use pci_zalloc_consistent Date: Tue, 05 Jun 2018 09:00:39 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <20180605.090039.1115878490025405476.davem@davemloft.net> References: <20180605122851.23912-1-yuehaibing@huawei.com> <20180605124929.GA13305@lst.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: andy.shevchenko@gmail.com, yuehaibing@huawei.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, jcliburn@gmail.com, chris.snook@gmail.com, benve@cisco.com, jdmason@kudzu.us, chessman@tux.org, jes@trained-monkey.org, rahul.verma@cavium.com To: hch@lst.de Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20180605124929.GA13305@lst.de> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org From: Christoph Hellwig Date: Tue, 5 Jun 2018 14:49:29 +0200 > On Tue, Jun 05, 2018 at 03:39:16PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote: >> On Tue, Jun 5, 2018 at 3:28 PM, YueHaibing wrote: >> > >> >> Hmm... Is PCI case anyhow special or it's a simple wrapper on top of >> dma.*alloc() ? > > All drivers should move from pci_dma* to dma_* eventually. Converting > from one flavor of deprecated to another is completely pointless. Agreed.