From: Jiri Pirko <jiri@resnulli.us>
To: Pamela Mei <pamela.mei@gmail.com>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Request to enable setting the nested network namespace
Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2018 11:27:54 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180614092754.GA2038@nanopsycho> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAG89sxLKUdcDNj8JHSX_QnHxJitZEMBpDywUDkZpy9qv8wGanw@mail.gmail.com>
Thu, Jun 14, 2018 at 10:04:57AM CEST, pamela.mei@gmail.com wrote:
>In linux, set up 2 network namespaces, ns1 and ns2. "ip netns list"
>can view the 2 network namespaces.
>Move one network device from linux root namespace to ns1 then from ns1
>to ns2, then delete ns2,
>expect that network device can move back to ns1,
>but actual result is that eth1 is back to linux root network
>namespace. I'm not sure whether it's as expected.
>
>Here is the detail test steps:
>
>1.ip netns add ns1
>
>2.ip netns add ns2
>
>3.ip link set eth1 netns ns1
>
>4.ip netns exec ns1 ip link set eth1 netns ns2
>
>5.ip netns del ns2
>
>Expected result: eth1 will be in ns1
>
>Actual result: eth1 is back in linux root namespace 1
>
>Question: is there any method to realize such scenario to make sure
>device can be back to ns1 not linux root network namespace 1?
>
>How about if there's a function to enable nest network namespace e.g.
>can set ns1 as the parent namespace of ns2, then device can return to
>ns1 when ns2 is gone.
You would have to track the whole history of netns changes for each
netdevice. That does not sound right. Move back to initial netns seems
correct to me.
>
>
>Cheers,
>
>Pamela MEI
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-06-14 9:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-06-14 8:04 Request to enable setting the nested network namespace Pamela Mei
2018-06-14 9:27 ` Jiri Pirko [this message]
2018-06-26 9:10 ` Pamela Mei
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180614092754.GA2038@nanopsycho \
--to=jiri@resnulli.us \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pamela.mei@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).