From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] enic: initialize enic->rfs_h.lock in enic_probe
Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2018 07:49:58 +0900 (KST)
Message-ID: <20180620.074958.941077810963592489.davem@davemloft.net>
References: <20180619151524.1326-1-gvaradar@cisco.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: benve@cisco.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org
To: gvaradar@cisco.com
Return-path: <netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from shards.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.9]:49192 "EHLO
        shards.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
        with ESMTP id S1752308AbeFSWuB (ORCPT
        <rfc822;netdev@vger.kernel.org>); Tue, 19 Jun 2018 18:50:01 -0400
In-Reply-To: <20180619151524.1326-1-gvaradar@cisco.com>
Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <netdev.vger.kernel.org>

From: Govindarajulu Varadarajan <gvaradar@cisco.com>
Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2018 08:15:24 -0700

> lockdep spotted that we are using rfs_h.lock in enic_get_rxnfc() without
> initializing. rfs_h.lock is initialized in enic_open(). But ethtool_ops
> can be called when interface is down.
> 
> Move enic_rfs_flw_tbl_init to enic_probe.
 ...
> Signed-off-by: Govindarajulu Varadarajan <gvaradar@cisco.com>

Applied, thanks.