From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Leon Romanovsky Subject: Re: [PATCH rdma-next 00/12] RDMA fixes 2018-06-24 Date: Wed, 27 Jun 2018 08:47:14 +0300 Message-ID: <20180627054714.GG30877@mtr-leonro.mtl.com> References: <20180624082353.16138-1-leon@kernel.org> <20180625213438.GA19857@ziepe.ca> <20180626042126.GM17747@mtr-leonro.mtl.com> <20180626203921.GF5381@ziepe.ca> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="Bn2rw/3z4jIqBvZU" Cc: Doug Ledford , RDMA mailing list , Matan Barak , Michael J Ruhl , Noa Osherovich , Raed Salem , Yishai Hadas , Saeed Mahameed , linux-netdev To: Jason Gunthorpe Return-path: Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:41680 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750986AbeF0FrR (ORCPT ); Wed, 27 Jun 2018 01:47:17 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20180626203921.GF5381@ziepe.ca> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: --Bn2rw/3z4jIqBvZU Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline On Tue, Jun 26, 2018 at 02:39:21PM -0600, Jason Gunthorpe wrote: > On Tue, Jun 26, 2018 at 07:21:26AM +0300, Leon Romanovsky wrote: > > On Mon, Jun 25, 2018 at 03:34:38PM -0600, Jason Gunthorpe wrote: > > > On Sun, Jun 24, 2018 at 11:23:41AM +0300, Leon Romanovsky wrote: > > > > From: Leon Romanovsky > > > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > > > This is bunch of patches trigged by running syzkaller internally. > > > > > > > > I'm sending them based on rdma-next mainly for two reasons: > > > > 1, Most of the patches fix the old issues and it doesn't matter when > > > > they will hit the Linus's tree: now or later in a couple of weeks > > > > during merge window. > > > > 2. They interleave with code cleanup, mlx5-next patches and Michael's > > > > feedback on flow counters series. > > > > > > > > Thanks > > > > > > > > Leon Romanovsky (12): > > > > RDMA/uverbs: Protect from attempts to create flows on unsupported QP > > > > RDMA/uverbs: Fix slab-out-of-bounds in ib_uverbs_ex_create_flow > > > > > > I applied these two to for-rc > > > > > > > RDMA/uverbs: Check existence of create_flow callback > > > > RDMA/verbs: Drop kernel variant of create_flow > > > > RDMA/verbs: Drop kernel variant of destroy_flow > > > > net/mlx5: Rate limit errors in command interface > > > > RDMA/uverbs: Don't overwrite NULL pointer with ZERO_SIZE_PTR > > > > RDMA/umem: Don't check for negative return value of dma_map_sg_attrs() > > > > RDMA/uverbs: Remove redundant check > > > > > > These to for-next > > > > Jason, > > > > We would like to see patch "[PATCH mlx5-next 05/12] net/mlx5: > > Rate limit errors in command interface" in out mlx5-next. Is it possible > > at this point to drop it from for-next, so I'll be able to take it into > > mlx5-next? > > Okay, you got to this while it was still 'wip', so it is dropped. Add > it to the mlx5-next branch and netdev or rdma can pull it next time > there is some reason to pull the branch.. Thanks, I cherry-picked that patch from your wip branch, so it includes your SOB too. Most probably, the RDMA will pull it in dump_fill_mkey series. Thanks > > Jason --Bn2rw/3z4jIqBvZU Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJbMyThAAoJEORje4g2clinHx4QAI/vK3WO2O7ozwHO8L0S1nmE aHD6G1tR1WPujlxdpvELjFDLX9yLisPXWWgTlaFnjS6rclpnldigWRtyArHDi895 XU/Co7POkh9utra3RFWFmqCGEIzxdxItHTvYAp5+OfdmyKvO2wX69w80gdaD4o6O 3q1qCDEw6SEC0UgokjlI/RBypdovoOiX32wWgTLpKVd9Si5iGPBKH7TA+iFs1LJQ r3Cc2txNCHWctwm0faCw55o6NM9wWiSP1AzJvFTzDpLRTSB7Bmv0Thztw3UBp86q xeVm/dk7xlMiUqU4U5HjOdqf/7FpvHrUuLX6OZtEDyIn2tqeS1/N9p1GIFOuxb1l /wTsESrbGMHCigju5VFmlRQA87856CKxVkFTxaj52GkcJPrmglSgiiTBJG1t5qqL VqE0VrBeMKLaBMTtoZsinz65NEjWcfsK6wHmDEkLK5zhivgzH3JVG+WO9x570h7z GtOpdSL3ZezqcNVr6RuwFeZL5f6nyedmP7G2lUpztTmLSR1vZmQuE3f5/sfZMUa3 71VzrPBqXpkxsC/as5mnrh8TmLExoQFUrR/w1W5/xjS7GcQAhyYWf1+7TbyiQKIo iE+qE4QgqGAAJLfIZ5nZYVNy8aZcbniNBacwcKoEFxjBMsdAsNCFIQsNFHaSfg1d D2t6sEZJuRXZ5h/poI0k =yV/R -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Bn2rw/3z4jIqBvZU--