From: Jakub Kicinski <jakub.kicinski@netronome.com>
To: Jiri Benc <jbenc@redhat.com>
Cc: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
davem@davemloft.net, Roopa Prabhu <roopa@cumulusnetworks.com>,
jiri@resnulli.us, jhs@mojatatu.com, xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com,
oss-drivers@netronome.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
Pieter Jansen van Vuuren <pieter.jansenvanvuuren@netronome.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v2 3/4] net: check tunnel option type in tunnel flags
Date: Thu, 28 Jun 2018 09:54:52 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180628095452.6f23fdf4@cakuba.netronome.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180628094206.62b6d8e2@redhat.com>
On Thu, 28 Jun 2018 09:42:06 +0200, Jiri Benc wrote:
> On Wed, 27 Jun 2018 11:49:49 +0200, Daniel Borkmann wrote:
> > Looks good to me, and yes in BPF case a mask like TUNNEL_OPTIONS_PRESENT is
> > right approach since this is opaque info and solely defined by the BPF prog
> > that is using the generic helper.
>
> Wouldn't it make sense to introduce some safeguards here (in a backward
> compatible way, of course)? It's easy to mistakenly set data for a
> different tunnel type in a BPF program and then be surprised by the
> result. It might help users if such usage was detected by the kernel,
> one way or another.
Well, that's how it works today ;)
> I'm thinking about something like the BPF program voluntarily
> specifying the type of the data; if not specified, the wildcard would be
> used as it is now.
Hmm... in practice we could steal top bits of the size parameter for
some flags, since it seems to be limited to values < 256 today? Is it
worth it?
It would look something along the lines of:
---
diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h b/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h
index 59b19b6a40d7..194b40efa8e8 100644
--- a/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h
+++ b/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h
@@ -2213,6 +2213,13 @@ enum bpf_func_id {
/* BPF_FUNC_perf_event_output for sk_buff input context. */
#define BPF_F_CTXLEN_MASK (0xfffffULL << 32)
+#define BPF_F_TUN_VXLAN (1U << 31)
+#define BPF_F_TUN_GENEVE (1U << 30)
+#define BPF_F_TUN_ERSPAN (1U << 29)
+#define BPF_F_TUN_FLAGS_ALL (BPF_F_TUN_VXLAN | \
+ BPF_F_TUN_GENEVE | \
+ BPF_F_TUN_ERSPAN)
+
/* Mode for BPF_FUNC_skb_adjust_room helper. */
enum bpf_adj_room_mode {
BPF_ADJ_ROOM_NET,
diff --git a/net/core/filter.c b/net/core/filter.c
index dade922678f6..cc592a1e8945 100644
--- a/net/core/filter.c
+++ b/net/core/filter.c
@@ -3576,6 +3576,22 @@ BPF_CALL_3(bpf_skb_set_tunnel_opt, struct sk_buff *, skb,
{
struct ip_tunnel_info *info = skb_tunnel_info(skb);
const struct metadata_dst *md = this_cpu_ptr(md_dst);
+ __be16 tun_flags;
+ u32 flags;
+
+ BUILD_BUG_ON(BPF_F_TUN_FLAGS_ALL & IP_TUNNEL_OPTS_MAX);
+
+ flags = size & BPF_F_TUN_FLAGS_ALL;
+ size &= ~flags;
+ if (flags & BPF_F_TUN_VXLAN)
+ tun_flags |= TUNNEL_VXLAN_OPT;
+ if (flags & BPF_F_TUN_GENEVE)
+ tun_flags |= TUNNEL_GENEVE_OPT;
+ if (flags & BPF_F_TUN_ERSPAN)
+ tun_flags |= TUNNEL_ERSPAN_OPT;
+ /* User didn't specify the tunnel type, for backward compat set all */
+ if (!(tun_flags & TUNNEL_OPTIONS_PRESENT))
+ tun_flags |= TUNNEL_OPTIONS_PRESENT;
if (unlikely(info != &md->u.tun_info || (size & (sizeof(u32) - 1))))
return -EINVAL;
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-06-28 16:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-06-27 4:39 [PATCH net-next v2 0/4] net: Geneve options support for TC act_tunnel_key Jakub Kicinski
2018-06-27 4:39 ` [PATCH net-next v2 1/4] net/sched: act_tunnel_key: disambiguate metadata dst error cases Jakub Kicinski
2018-06-27 4:39 ` [PATCH net-next v2 2/4] net/sched: act_tunnel_key: add extended ack support Jakub Kicinski
2018-06-27 4:39 ` [PATCH net-next v2 3/4] net: check tunnel option type in tunnel flags Jakub Kicinski
2018-06-27 9:49 ` Daniel Borkmann
2018-06-28 7:42 ` Jiri Benc
2018-06-28 16:54 ` Jakub Kicinski [this message]
2018-06-28 17:01 ` Jiri Benc
2018-06-28 17:05 ` Jakub Kicinski
2018-06-29 9:06 ` Jiri Benc
2018-06-29 7:04 ` Daniel Borkmann
2018-06-29 17:01 ` Jakub Kicinski
2018-06-30 8:47 ` Daniel Borkmann
2018-06-27 4:39 ` [PATCH net-next v2 4/4] net/sched: add tunnel option support to act_tunnel_key Jakub Kicinski
2018-06-29 14:51 ` [PATCH net-next v2 0/4] net: Geneve options support for TC act_tunnel_key David Miller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180628095452.6f23fdf4@cakuba.netronome.com \
--to=jakub.kicinski@netronome.com \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=jbenc@redhat.com \
--cc=jhs@mojatatu.com \
--cc=jiri@resnulli.us \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=oss-drivers@netronome.com \
--cc=pieter.jansenvanvuuren@netronome.com \
--cc=roopa@cumulusnetworks.com \
--cc=xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).