From: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
To: lucien.xin@gmail.com
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-sctp@vger.kernel.org,
marcelo.leitner@gmail.com, nhorman@tuxdriver.com
Subject: Re: [PATCHv3 net-next] sctp: add support for SCTP_REUSE_PORT sockopt
Date: Fri, 29 Jun 2018 22:21:17 +0900 (KST) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180629.222117.334133330999645450.davem@davemloft.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <710f2cfa644383f8455d9612a80347a28e00d113.1530171060.git.lucien.xin@gmail.com>
From: Xin Long <lucien.xin@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 28 Jun 2018 15:31:00 +0800
> This feature is actually already supported by sk->sk_reuse which can be
> set by socket level opt SO_REUSEADDR. But it's not working exactly as
> RFC6458 demands in section 8.1.27, like:
>
> - This option only supports one-to-one style SCTP sockets
> - This socket option must not be used after calling bind()
> or sctp_bindx().
>
> Besides, SCTP_REUSE_PORT sockopt should be provided for user's programs.
> Otherwise, the programs with SCTP_REUSE_PORT from other systems will not
> work in linux.
>
> To separate it from the socket level version, this patch adds 'reuse' in
> sctp_sock and it works pretty much as sk->sk_reuse, but with some extra
> setup limitations that are needed when it is being enabled.
>
> "It should be noted that the behavior of the socket-level socket option
> to reuse ports and/or addresses for SCTP sockets is unspecified", so it
> leaves SO_REUSEADDR as is for the compatibility.
>
> Note that the name SCTP_REUSE_PORT is somewhat confusing, as its
> functionality is nearly identical to SO_REUSEADDR, but with some
> extra restrictions. Here it uses 'reuse' in sctp_sock instead of
> 'reuseport'. As for sk->sk_reuseport support for SCTP, it will be
> added in another patch.
>
> Thanks to Neil to make this clear.
>
> v1->v2:
> - add sctp_sk->reuse to separate it from the socket level version.
> v2->v3:
> - improve changelog according to Marcelo's suggestion.
>
> Acked-by: Neil Horman <nhorman@tuxdriver.com>
> Signed-off-by: Xin Long <lucien.xin@gmail.com>
Applied, thanks for working on getting the semantics right.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-06-29 13:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-06-28 7:31 [PATCHv3 net-next] sctp: add support for SCTP_REUSE_PORT sockopt Xin Long
2018-06-29 13:21 ` David Miller [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180629.222117.334133330999645450.davem@davemloft.net \
--to=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=linux-sctp@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lucien.xin@gmail.com \
--cc=marcelo.leitner@gmail.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nhorman@tuxdriver.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox