From: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
To: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Cc: alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf] bpf: fix ldx in ld_abs rewrite for large offsets
Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2018 11:14:33 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180710101432.u5rdnmofd3imf5vu@lakrids.cambridge.arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1aaf318d0b40fc471a0d1705efd8c69d98fbf866.1531175919.git.daniel@iogearbox.net>
On Tue, Jul 10, 2018 at 12:43:22AM +0200, Daniel Borkmann wrote:
> Mark reported that syzkaller triggered a KASAN detected slab-out-of-bounds
> bug in ___bpf_prog_run() with a BPF_LD | BPF_ABS word load at offset 0x8001.
> After further investigation it became clear that the issue was the
> BPF_LDX_MEM() which takes offset as an argument whereas it cannot encode
> larger than S16_MAX offsets into it. For this synthetical case we need to
> move the full address into tmp register instead and do the LDX without
> immediate value.
>
> Fixes: e0cea7ce988c ("bpf: implement ld_abs/ld_ind in native bpf")
> Reported-by: syzbot <syzkaller@googlegroups.com>
> Reported-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
> ---
> net/core/filter.c | 16 +++++++++++++---
> 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/net/core/filter.c b/net/core/filter.c
> index 5fa66a3..a13f5b1 100644
> --- a/net/core/filter.c
> +++ b/net/core/filter.c
> @@ -459,11 +459,21 @@ static bool convert_bpf_ld_abs(struct sock_filter *fp, struct bpf_insn **insnp)
> (!unaligned_ok && offset >= 0 &&
> offset + ip_align >= 0 &&
> offset + ip_align % size == 0))) {
> + bool ldx_off_ok = offset <= S16_MAX;
> +
Given offset is a (signed) int, is it possible for that to be a negative
value less than S16_MIN? ... or is that ruled out elsewhere?
Thanks,
Mark.
> *insn++ = BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_TMP, BPF_REG_H);
> *insn++ = BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_SUB, BPF_REG_TMP, offset);
> - *insn++ = BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JSLT, BPF_REG_TMP, size, 2 + endian);
> - *insn++ = BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_SIZE(fp->code), BPF_REG_A, BPF_REG_D,
> - offset);
> + *insn++ = BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JSLT, BPF_REG_TMP,
> + size, 2 + endian + (!ldx_off_ok * 2));
> + if (ldx_off_ok) {
> + *insn++ = BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_SIZE(fp->code), BPF_REG_A,
> + BPF_REG_D, offset);
> + } else {
> + *insn++ = BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_TMP, BPF_REG_D);
> + *insn++ = BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_TMP, offset);
> + *insn++ = BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_SIZE(fp->code), BPF_REG_A,
> + BPF_REG_TMP, 0);
> + }
> if (endian)
> *insn++ = BPF_ENDIAN(BPF_FROM_BE, BPF_REG_A, size * 8);
> *insn++ = BPF_JMP_A(8);
> --
> 2.9.5
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-07-10 10:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-07-09 22:43 [PATCH bpf] bpf: fix ldx in ld_abs rewrite for large offsets Daniel Borkmann
2018-07-10 10:14 ` Mark Rutland [this message]
2018-07-10 12:13 ` Daniel Borkmann
2018-07-10 12:27 ` Mark Rutland
2018-07-10 15:19 ` Alexei Starovoitov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180710101432.u5rdnmofd3imf5vu@lakrids.cambridge.arm.com \
--to=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox