From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Dan Carpenter Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] samples: bpf: ensure that we don't load over MAX_PROGS programs Date: Fri, 13 Jul 2018 18:15:41 +0300 Message-ID: <20180713151541.m6ksulnjb6qsh24w@mwanda> References: <20180713151139.aiqginrahbimfsop@kili.mountain> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Alexei Starovoitov , Daniel Borkmann , netdev@vger.kernel.org, kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org To: Colin Ian King Return-path: Received: from userp2120.oracle.com ([156.151.31.85]:38228 "EHLO userp2120.oracle.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1729647AbeGMPbV (ORCPT ); Fri, 13 Jul 2018 11:31:21 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Fri, Jul 13, 2018 at 04:13:30PM +0100, Colin Ian King wrote: > On 13/07/18 16:11, Dan Carpenter wrote: > > I can't see that we check prog_cnt to ensure it doesn't go over > > MAX_PROGS. > > > > Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter > > > > diff --git a/samples/bpf/bpf_load.c b/samples/bpf/bpf_load.c > > index 89161c9ed466..904e775d1a44 100644 > > --- a/samples/bpf/bpf_load.c > > +++ b/samples/bpf/bpf_load.c > > @@ -107,6 +107,9 @@ static int load_and_attach(const char *event, struct bpf_insn *prog, int size) > > return -1; > > } > > > > + if (prog_cnt == MAX_PROGS) > > + return -1; > > + > > Should that be "if (prog_cnt >= MAX_PROGS)" ? It's incremented one at a time so it can't go over. regards, dan carpenter