From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Okash Khawaja Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next v5 0/3] bpf: btf: print bpftool map data with btf Date: Fri, 13 Jul 2018 22:35:51 +0100 Message-ID: <20180713213550.GA5667@w1t1fb> References: <20180712030803.875913594@fb.com> <20180711203010.51bab0cf@cakuba.lan> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Cc: Jakub Kicinski , Martin KaFai Lau , Alexei Starovoitov , Yonghong Song , Quentin Monnet , "David S. Miller" , , , To: Daniel Borkmann Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org On Fri, Jul 13, 2018 at 10:49:01PM +0200, Daniel Borkmann wrote: > On 07/12/2018 05:30 AM, Jakub Kicinski wrote: > > On Wed, 11 Jul 2018 20:08:03 -0700, Okash Khawaja wrote: > >> Hi, > >> > >> Here are the changes from v4: > >> > >> patch 2: > >> > >> - sort headers in btf_dumper.c > >> - remove extra parentheses > >> - include asm/byteorder.h > >> - compile error when big and small endian bitfields macro undefined > > > > Reviewed-by: Jakub Kicinski > > Hmm, strange, by accident I just noticed that only your bpf fix ever made > it to patchwork, Okash. > > https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__patchwork.ozlabs.org_project_netdev_list_-3Fsubmitter-3D74458-26state-3D-2A&d=DwICaQ&c=5VD0RTtNlTh3ycd41b3MUw&r=4wHrS7MHHFLZe_WCJwRVhA&m=wkiBQFYWPyiN9WONHLY0WiZxcOwNRhXaMMLIE551mCA&s=RggQzClRdkwawboGLPgPXHOdUtYffxeOwlcBlFru-P4&e= > > Potentially because you've sent with attachments which got dropped on > the list? interesting because i send all patches using quilt mail, the same way i sent bpf fix. i can try git-send-email. also i dropped Acked-by as i changed patch versions. is it common thing to do? or should i keep the Acked-by? > > Could you properly submit the series again, and retaining Jakub's Reviewed-by > tag to the patches? > > Thanks, > Daniel