Netdev List
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
To: tariqt@mellanox.com
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, eranbe@mellanox.com, xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v2] net: remove redundant input checks in SIOCSIFTXQLEN case of dev_ifsioc
Date: Tue, 24 Jul 2018 11:36:50 -0700 (PDT)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180724.113650.740665928630154623.davem@davemloft.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1532429580-9710-1-git-send-email-tariqt@mellanox.com>

From: Tariq Toukan <tariqt@mellanox.com>
Date: Tue, 24 Jul 2018 13:53:00 +0300

> The cited patch added a call to dev_change_tx_queue_len in
> SIOCSIFTXQLEN case.
> This obsoletes the new len comparison check done before the function call.
> Remove it here.
> 
> For the desicion of keep/remove the negative value check, we examine the
> range check in dev_change_tx_queue_len.
> On 64-bit we will fail with -ERANGE.  The 32-bit int ifr_qlen will be sign
> extended to 64-bits when it is passed into dev_change_tx_queue_len(). And
> then for negative values this test triggers:
> 
> 	if (new_len != (unsigned int)new_len)
> 		return -ERANGE;
> 
> because:
> 	if (0xffffffffWHATEVER != 0x00000000WHATEVER)
> 
> On 32-bit the signed value will be accepted, changing behavior.
> 
> Therefore, the negative value check is kept.
> 
> Fixes: 3f76df198288 ("net: use dev_change_tx_queue_len() for SIOCSIFTXQLEN")
> Signed-off-by: Tariq Toukan <tariqt@mellanox.com>
> Reviewed-by: Eran Ben Elisha <eranbe@mellanox.com>

Applied, thank you.

      reply	other threads:[~2018-07-24 19:44 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-07-24 10:53 [PATCH net-next v2] net: remove redundant input checks in SIOCSIFTXQLEN case of dev_ifsioc Tariq Toukan
2018-07-24 18:36 ` David Miller [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20180724.113650.740665928630154623.davem@davemloft.net \
    --to=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=eranbe@mellanox.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=tariqt@mellanox.com \
    --cc=xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox