From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 0/4] nfp: protect from theoretical size
 overflows and SR-IOV errors
Date: Wed, 25 Jul 2018 22:18:01 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <20180725.221801.2029165624240760094.davem@davemloft.net>
References: <20180726024037.28704-1-jakub.kicinski@netronome.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: oss-drivers@netronome.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org
To: jakub.kicinski@netronome.com
Return-path: <netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from shards.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.9]:33102 "EHLO
        shards.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
        with ESMTP id S1727070AbeGZGdJ (ORCPT
        <rfc822;netdev@vger.kernel.org>); Thu, 26 Jul 2018 02:33:09 -0400
In-Reply-To: <20180726024037.28704-1-jakub.kicinski@netronome.com>
Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <netdev.vger.kernel.org>

From: Jakub Kicinski <jakub.kicinski@netronome.com>
Date: Wed, 25 Jul 2018 19:40:33 -0700

> This small set changes the handling of pci_sriov_set_totalvfs() errors.
> nfp is the only driver which fails probe on pci_sriov_set_totalvfs()
> errors.  It turns out some BIOS configurations may break SR-IOV and
> users who don't use that feature should not suffer.
> 
> Remaining patches makes sure we use overflow-safe function for ring
> allocation, even though ring sizes are limited.  It won't hurt and
> we can also enable fallback to vmalloc() if memory is tight while
> at it.

Series applied, thanks Jakub.