From: Jiri Pirko <jiri@resnulli.us>
To: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, Jamal Hadi Salim <jhs@mojatatu.com>,
Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
Marcelo Ricardo Leitner <marcelo.leitner@gmail.com>,
Eyal Birger <eyal.birger@gmail.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v3 5/5] act_mirred: use TC_ACT_REINJECT when possible
Date: Wed, 25 Jul 2018 15:52:15 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180725135215.GM2164@nanopsycho> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <612f6fb5b0cdddcbbc2d99f65b148b7f3b8b9a27.1532437050.git.pabeni@redhat.com>
Tue, Jul 24, 2018 at 10:06:43PM CEST, pabeni@redhat.com wrote:
>When mirred is invoked from the ingress path, and it wants to redirect
>the processed packet, it can now use the TC_ACT_REINJECT action,
>filling the tcf_result accordingly, and avoiding a per packet
>skb_clone().
>
>Overall this gives a ~10% improvement in forwarding performance for the
>TC S/W data path and TC S/W performances are now comparable to the
>kernel openvswitch datapath.
>
>v1 -> v2: use ACT_MIRRED instead of ACT_REDIRECT
>v2 -> v3: updated after action rename, fixed a typo into the commit
> message
>
>Signed-off-by: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>
>---
> net/sched/act_mirred.c | 34 ++++++++++++++++++++++++----------
> 1 file changed, 24 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
>
>diff --git a/net/sched/act_mirred.c b/net/sched/act_mirred.c
>index eeb335f03102..368187312136 100644
>--- a/net/sched/act_mirred.c
>+++ b/net/sched/act_mirred.c
>@@ -25,6 +25,7 @@
> #include <net/net_namespace.h>
> #include <net/netlink.h>
> #include <net/pkt_sched.h>
>+#include <net/pkt_cls.h>
> #include <linux/tc_act/tc_mirred.h>
> #include <net/tc_act/tc_mirred.h>
>
>@@ -171,10 +172,12 @@ static int tcf_mirred(struct sk_buff *skb, const struct tc_action *a,
> struct tcf_result *res)
> {
> struct tcf_mirred *m = to_mirred(a);
>+ struct sk_buff *skb2 = skb;
> bool m_mac_header_xmit;
> struct net_device *dev;
>- struct sk_buff *skb2;
> int retval, err = 0;
>+ bool want_ingress;
>+ bool is_redirect;
> int m_eaction;
> int mac_len;
>
>@@ -196,16 +199,19 @@ static int tcf_mirred(struct sk_buff *skb, const struct tc_action *a,
> goto out;
> }
>
>- skb2 = skb_clone(skb, GFP_ATOMIC);
>- if (!skb2)
>- goto out;
>+ is_redirect = tcf_mirred_is_act_redirect(m_eaction);
>+ if (!skb_at_tc_ingress(skb) || !is_redirect) {
>+ skb2 = skb_clone(skb, GFP_ATOMIC);
>+ if (!skb2)
>+ goto out;
>+ }
>
> /* If action's target direction differs than filter's direction,
> * and devices expect a mac header on xmit, then mac push/pull is
> * needed.
> */
>- if (skb_at_tc_ingress(skb) != tcf_mirred_act_wants_ingress(m_eaction) &&
>- m_mac_header_xmit) {
>+ want_ingress = tcf_mirred_act_wants_ingress(m_eaction);
>+ if (skb_at_tc_ingress(skb) != want_ingress && m_mac_header_xmit) {
> if (!skb_at_tc_ingress(skb)) {
> /* caught at egress, act ingress: pull mac */
> mac_len = skb_network_header(skb) - skb_mac_header(skb);
>@@ -216,15 +222,23 @@ static int tcf_mirred(struct sk_buff *skb, const struct tc_action *a,
> }
> }
>
>+ skb2->skb_iif = skb->dev->ifindex;
>+ skb2->dev = dev;
>+
> /* mirror is always swallowed */
>- if (tcf_mirred_is_act_redirect(m_eaction)) {
>+ if (is_redirect) {
> skb2->tc_redirected = 1;
> skb2->tc_from_ingress = skb2->tc_at_ingress;
>+
>+ /* let's the caller reinject the packet, if possible */
>+ if (skb_at_tc_ingress(skb)) {
I probably missed something. Why only on ingress?
The patch looks good to me.
>+ res->ingress = want_ingress;
>+ res->qstats = this_cpu_ptr(m->common.cpu_qstats);
>+ return TC_ACT_REINJECT;
>+ }
> }
>
>- skb2->skb_iif = skb->dev->ifindex;
>- skb2->dev = dev;
>- if (!tcf_mirred_act_wants_ingress(m_eaction))
>+ if (!want_ingress)
> err = dev_queue_xmit(skb2);
> else
> err = netif_receive_skb(skb2);
>--
>2.17.1
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-07-25 15:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 43+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-07-24 20:06 [PATCH net-next v3 0/5] TC: refactor act_mirred packets re-injection Paolo Abeni
2018-07-24 20:06 ` [PATCH net-next v3 1/5] tc/act: user space can't use TC_ACT_REDIRECT directly Paolo Abeni
2018-07-25 11:55 ` Jamal Hadi Salim
2018-07-25 11:56 ` Jiri Pirko
2018-07-25 12:54 ` Paolo Abeni
2018-07-25 13:03 ` Jiri Pirko
2018-07-25 15:48 ` Paolo Abeni
2018-07-25 16:29 ` Paolo Abeni
2018-07-25 16:29 ` Daniel Borkmann
2018-07-26 7:43 ` Jiri Pirko
2018-07-27 2:48 ` Daniel Borkmann
2018-07-24 20:06 ` [PATCH net-next v3 2/5] net/sched: user-space can't set unknown tcfa_action values Paolo Abeni
2018-07-25 12:26 ` Jiri Pirko
2018-07-24 20:06 ` [PATCH net-next v3 3/5] tc/act: remove unneeded RCU lock in action callback Paolo Abeni
2018-07-25 11:59 ` Jamal Hadi Salim
2018-07-25 18:24 ` Marcelo Ricardo Leitner
2018-07-25 12:32 ` Jiri Pirko
2018-07-24 20:06 ` [PATCH net-next v3 4/5] net/tc: introduce TC_ACT_REINJECT Paolo Abeni
2018-07-24 20:38 ` Cong Wang
2018-07-24 20:50 ` Cong Wang
2018-07-25 8:29 ` Paolo Abeni
2018-07-25 12:27 ` Jamal Hadi Salim
2018-07-25 14:24 ` Paolo Abeni
2018-07-25 15:26 ` Jamal Hadi Salim
2018-07-25 16:48 ` Cong Wang
2018-07-25 17:09 ` Marcelo Ricardo Leitner
2018-07-26 12:52 ` Jamal Hadi Salim
2018-07-26 23:25 ` Cong Wang
2018-07-25 12:16 ` Jamal Hadi Salim
2018-07-25 12:59 ` Jiri Pirko
2018-07-25 13:55 ` Paolo Abeni
2018-07-25 12:57 ` Jiri Pirko
2018-07-24 20:06 ` [PATCH net-next v3 5/5] act_mirred: use TC_ACT_REINJECT when possible Paolo Abeni
2018-07-24 21:15 ` Cong Wang
2018-07-25 10:14 ` Paolo Abeni
2018-07-25 13:30 ` Jiri Pirko
2018-07-25 11:50 ` Jamal Hadi Salim
2018-07-25 13:52 ` Jiri Pirko [this message]
2018-07-25 14:04 ` Paolo Abeni
2018-07-25 14:30 ` Jiri Pirko
2018-07-25 11:53 ` [PATCH net-next v3 0/5] TC: refactor act_mirred packets re-injection Jiri Pirko
2018-07-25 12:07 ` Paolo Abeni
2018-07-25 12:17 ` Jiri Pirko
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180725135215.GM2164@nanopsycho \
--to=jiri@resnulli.us \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=eyal.birger@gmail.com \
--cc=jhs@mojatatu.com \
--cc=marcelo.leitner@gmail.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox