From: Jiri Pirko <jiri@resnulli.us>
To: Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com>
Cc: Linux Kernel Network Developers <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>,
Jamal Hadi Salim <jhs@mojatatu.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <jakub.kicinski@netronome.com>,
Simon Horman <simon.horman@netronome.com>,
john.hurley@netronome.com, David Ahern <dsahern@gmail.com>,
mlxsw@mellanox.com, sridhar.samudrala@intel.com
Subject: Re: [patch net-next v4 03/12] net: sched: introduce chain object to uapi
Date: Thu, 26 Jul 2018 12:06:14 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180726100614.GF2222@nanopsycho> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180726073839.GB2222@nanopsycho>
Thu, Jul 26, 2018 at 09:38:39AM CEST, jiri@resnulli.us wrote:
>Wed, Jul 25, 2018 at 06:40:44PM CEST, xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com wrote:
>>On Tue, Jul 24, 2018 at 11:49 PM Jiri Pirko <jiri@resnulli.us> wrote:
>>>
>>> Wed, Jul 25, 2018 at 01:20:08AM CEST, xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com wrote:
>>> >So, you only send out notification when the last refcnt is gone.
>>> >
>>> >If the chain that is being deleted by a user is still used by an action,
>>> >you return 0 or -EPERM?
>>>
>>> 0 and the chain stays there until the action is removed. Hmm, do you thing
>>> that -EPERM should be returned in that case? The thing is, we have to
>>> flush the chain in order to see the action references are there. We would
>>> have to have 2 ref counters, one for filter, one for actions.
>>> What do you think?
>>
>>_If_ RTM_DELCHAIN does decrease the chain refcnt, then it is
>>broken:
>>
>># tc chain add X... (refcnt == 1)
>># tc action add ... goto chain X (refcnt==2)
>># tc chain del X ... (refcnt== 1)
>># tc chain del X ... (refcnt==0)
>>
>>RTM_DELCHAIN should just test if refcnt is 1, if it is, delete it,
>>otherwise return -EPERM. This is how we handle tc standalone
>>actions, see tcf_idr_delete_index().
>>
>>Yes, you might need two refcnt's here.
>
>Okay. Sounds good. I'm on it.
Actually, I found an issue. The action to "goto chain" might be attached
to a filter in the same chain. That is completely legitimate usage.
When I do:
# tc chain del X
I expect the chain to be flushed and removed. If there is an action
there with "goto" to the same chain, the command should be successful.
However, I don't see any easy way to find out if the chain is referenced
only by actions used by filters in the same chain :/
Thoughts?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-07-26 11:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-07-23 7:23 [patch net-next v4 00/12] sched: introduce chain templates support with offloading to mlxsw Jiri Pirko
2018-07-23 7:23 ` [patch net-next v4 01/12] net: sched: push ops lookup bits into tcf_proto_lookup_ops() Jiri Pirko
2018-07-23 7:23 ` [patch net-next v4 02/12] net: sched: Avoid implicit chain 0 creation Jiri Pirko
2018-07-23 7:23 ` [patch net-next v4 03/12] net: sched: introduce chain object to uapi Jiri Pirko
2018-07-24 22:30 ` Cong Wang
2018-07-24 23:20 ` Cong Wang
2018-07-25 6:46 ` Jiri Pirko
2018-07-25 16:40 ` Cong Wang
2018-07-26 7:38 ` Jiri Pirko
2018-07-26 10:06 ` Jiri Pirko [this message]
2018-07-26 12:27 ` Jiri Pirko
2018-07-23 7:23 ` [patch net-next v4 04/12] net: sched: introduce chain templates Jiri Pirko
2018-07-23 7:23 ` [patch net-next v4 05/12] net: sched: cls_flower: move key/mask dumping into a separate function Jiri Pirko
2018-07-23 7:23 ` [patch net-next v4 06/12] net: sched: cls_flower: change fl_init_dissector to accept mask and dissector Jiri Pirko
2018-07-23 7:23 ` [patch net-next v4 07/12] net: sched: cls_flower: implement chain templates Jiri Pirko
2018-07-23 7:23 ` [patch net-next v4 08/12] net: sched: cls_flower: propagate chain teplate creation and destruction to drivers Jiri Pirko
2018-07-23 7:23 ` [patch net-next v4 09/12] mlxsw: spectrum: Implement chain template hinting Jiri Pirko
2018-07-23 7:24 ` [patch net-next v4 10/12] selftests: forwarding: move shblock tc support check to a separate helper Jiri Pirko
2018-07-23 7:24 ` [patch net-next v4 11/12] selftests: forwarding: add tests for TC chains creation adn destruction Jiri Pirko
2018-07-23 7:24 ` [patch net-next v4 12/12] selftests: forwarding: add tests for TC chain templates Jiri Pirko
2018-07-23 7:24 ` [patch iproute2/net-next v4] tc: introduce support for " Jiri Pirko
2018-07-25 17:03 ` David Ahern
2018-07-23 16:28 ` [patch net-next v4 00/12] sched: introduce chain templates support with offloading to mlxsw David Miller
2018-07-23 23:36 ` Jakub Kicinski
2018-07-24 3:45 ` David Miller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180726100614.GF2222@nanopsycho \
--to=jiri@resnulli.us \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=dsahern@gmail.com \
--cc=jakub.kicinski@netronome.com \
--cc=jhs@mojatatu.com \
--cc=john.hurley@netronome.com \
--cc=mlxsw@mellanox.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=simon.horman@netronome.com \
--cc=sridhar.samudrala@intel.com \
--cc=xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).