From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Subject: Re: pull request (net-next): ipsec-next 2018-07-27
Date: Fri, 27 Jul 2018 09:37:48 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <20180727.093748.885289579666956123.davem@davemloft.net>
References: <20180727072449.11896-1-steffen.klassert@secunet.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: herbert@gondor.apana.org.au, netdev@vger.kernel.org
To: steffen.klassert@secunet.com
Return-path: <netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from shards.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.9]:34652 "EHLO
        shards.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
        with ESMTP id S1730205AbeG0SA3 (ORCPT
        <rfc822;netdev@vger.kernel.org>); Fri, 27 Jul 2018 14:00:29 -0400
In-Reply-To: <20180727072449.11896-1-steffen.klassert@secunet.com>
Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <netdev.vger.kernel.org>

From: Steffen Klassert <steffen.klassert@secunet.com>
Date: Fri, 27 Jul 2018 09:24:35 +0200

> 4) Add virtual xfrm interfaces. The purpose of these interfaces
>    is to overcome the design limitations that the existing
>    VTI devices have.

Thanks for taking the time to explain this in detail.  Looks
great.

Pulled, thanks Steffen.