netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
To: netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 4/5] net: remove sock_poll_busy_loop
Date: Fri, 27 Jul 2018 16:02:13 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180727140214.1938-5-hch@lst.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180727140214.1938-1-hch@lst.de>

There is no point in hiding this logic in a helper.  Also remove the
useless events != 0 check and only busy loop once we know we actually
have a poll method.

Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
---
 include/net/busy_poll.h | 9 ---------
 net/socket.c            | 5 ++++-
 2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)

diff --git a/include/net/busy_poll.h b/include/net/busy_poll.h
index c5187438af38..25d762cf47f2 100644
--- a/include/net/busy_poll.h
+++ b/include/net/busy_poll.h
@@ -121,15 +121,6 @@ static inline void sk_busy_loop(struct sock *sk, int nonblock)
 #endif
 }
 
-static inline void sock_poll_busy_loop(struct socket *sock, __poll_t events)
-{
-	if (sk_can_busy_loop(sock->sk) &&
-	    events && (events & POLL_BUSY_LOOP)) {
-		/* once, only if requested by syscall */
-		sk_busy_loop(sock->sk, 1);
-	}
-}
-
 /* if this socket can poll_ll, tell the system call */
 static inline __poll_t sock_poll_busy_flag(struct socket *sock)
 {
diff --git a/net/socket.c b/net/socket.c
index 39e0afbdd797..399d2ccec89d 100644
--- a/net/socket.c
+++ b/net/socket.c
@@ -1130,9 +1130,12 @@ static __poll_t sock_poll(struct file *file, poll_table *wait)
 	struct socket *sock = file->private_data;
 	__poll_t events = poll_requested_events(wait);
 
-	sock_poll_busy_loop(sock, events);
 	if (!sock->ops->poll)
 		return 0;
+
+	/* poll once if requested by the syscall */
+	if (sk_can_busy_loop(sock->sk) && (events & POLL_BUSY_LOOP))
+		sk_busy_loop(sock->sk, 1);
 	return sock->ops->poll(file, sock, wait) | sock_poll_busy_flag(sock);
 }
 
-- 
2.18.0

  parent reply	other threads:[~2018-07-27 15:24 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-07-27 14:02 socket poll related cleanups Christoph Hellwig
2018-07-27 14:02 ` [PATCH 1/5] net: remove bogus RCU annotations on socket.wq Christoph Hellwig
2018-07-29 20:05   ` David Miller
2018-07-30  7:44     ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-07-30 16:09       ` David Miller
2018-07-27 14:02 ` [PATCH 2/5] net: simplify sock_poll_wait Christoph Hellwig
2018-07-27 14:02 ` [PATCH 3/5] net: don not detour through struct sock to find the poll waitqueue Christoph Hellwig
2018-07-27 14:02 ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
2018-07-27 14:02 ` [PATCH 5/5] net: remove sock_poll_busy_flag Christoph Hellwig

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20180727140214.1938-5-hch@lst.de \
    --to=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).