From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
To: netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 4/5] net: remove sock_poll_busy_loop
Date: Fri, 27 Jul 2018 16:02:13 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180727140214.1938-5-hch@lst.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180727140214.1938-1-hch@lst.de>
There is no point in hiding this logic in a helper. Also remove the
useless events != 0 check and only busy loop once we know we actually
have a poll method.
Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
---
include/net/busy_poll.h | 9 ---------
net/socket.c | 5 ++++-
2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/net/busy_poll.h b/include/net/busy_poll.h
index c5187438af38..25d762cf47f2 100644
--- a/include/net/busy_poll.h
+++ b/include/net/busy_poll.h
@@ -121,15 +121,6 @@ static inline void sk_busy_loop(struct sock *sk, int nonblock)
#endif
}
-static inline void sock_poll_busy_loop(struct socket *sock, __poll_t events)
-{
- if (sk_can_busy_loop(sock->sk) &&
- events && (events & POLL_BUSY_LOOP)) {
- /* once, only if requested by syscall */
- sk_busy_loop(sock->sk, 1);
- }
-}
-
/* if this socket can poll_ll, tell the system call */
static inline __poll_t sock_poll_busy_flag(struct socket *sock)
{
diff --git a/net/socket.c b/net/socket.c
index 39e0afbdd797..399d2ccec89d 100644
--- a/net/socket.c
+++ b/net/socket.c
@@ -1130,9 +1130,12 @@ static __poll_t sock_poll(struct file *file, poll_table *wait)
struct socket *sock = file->private_data;
__poll_t events = poll_requested_events(wait);
- sock_poll_busy_loop(sock, events);
if (!sock->ops->poll)
return 0;
+
+ /* poll once if requested by the syscall */
+ if (sk_can_busy_loop(sock->sk) && (events & POLL_BUSY_LOOP))
+ sk_busy_loop(sock->sk, 1);
return sock->ops->poll(file, sock, wait) | sock_poll_busy_flag(sock);
}
--
2.18.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-07-27 15:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-07-27 14:02 socket poll related cleanups Christoph Hellwig
2018-07-27 14:02 ` [PATCH 1/5] net: remove bogus RCU annotations on socket.wq Christoph Hellwig
2018-07-29 20:05 ` David Miller
2018-07-30 7:44 ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-07-30 16:09 ` David Miller
2018-07-27 14:02 ` [PATCH 2/5] net: simplify sock_poll_wait Christoph Hellwig
2018-07-27 14:02 ` [PATCH 3/5] net: don not detour through struct sock to find the poll waitqueue Christoph Hellwig
2018-07-27 14:02 ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
2018-07-27 14:02 ` [PATCH 5/5] net: remove sock_poll_busy_flag Christoph Hellwig
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180727140214.1938-5-hch@lst.de \
--to=hch@lst.de \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).