From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Subject: Re: [net-next v6 1/2] net/tls: Use socket data_ready callback on
 record availability
Date: Sat, 28 Jul 2018 23:17:35 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <20180728.231735.773910012836290231.davem@davemloft.net>
References: <20180724.131235.814794866288330271.davem@davemloft.net>
        <DB7PR04MB4252186A40EA1A3E0773B34D8B540@DB7PR04MB4252.eurprd04.prod.outlook.com>
        <DB7PR04MB42528E1528A442E42FA7CBF38B280@DB7PR04MB4252.eurprd04.prod.outlook.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, borisp@mellanox.com, aviadye@mellanox.com,
        davejwatson@fb.com
To: vakul.garg@nxp.com
Return-path: <netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from shards.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.9]:33944 "EHLO
        shards.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
        with ESMTP id S1726154AbeG2Hq5 (ORCPT
        <rfc822;netdev@vger.kernel.org>); Sun, 29 Jul 2018 03:46:57 -0400
In-Reply-To: <DB7PR04MB42528E1528A442E42FA7CBF38B280@DB7PR04MB4252.eurprd04.prod.outlook.com>
Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <netdev.vger.kernel.org>

From: Vakul Garg <vakul.garg@nxp.com>
Date: Sun, 29 Jul 2018 06:01:29 +0000

> Could you please correct me if my counter-reasoning behind changing
> the socket callback is wrong?

Ok, after stufying the code a bit I agree with your analysis.