From: Vakul Garg <vakul.garg@nxp.com>
To: netdev@vger.kernel.org
Cc: borisp@mellanox.com, aviadye@mellanox.com, davejwatson@fb.com,
davem@davemloft.net, Vakul Garg <vakul.garg@nxp.com>
Subject: [PATCH net-next v7] net/tls: Use socket data_ready callback on record availability
Date: Mon, 30 Jul 2018 16:08:33 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180730103833.6585-1-vakul.garg@nxp.com> (raw)
On receipt of a complete tls record, use socket's saved data_ready
callback instead of state_change callback. In function tls_queue(),
the TLS record is queued in encrypted state. But the decryption
happen inline when tls_sw_recvmsg() or tls_sw_splice_read() get invoked.
So it should be ok to notify the waiting context about the availability
of data as soon as we could collect a full TLS record. For new data
availability notification, sk_data_ready callback is more appropriate.
It points to sock_def_readable() which wakes up specifically for EPOLLIN
event. This is in contrast to the socket callback sk_state_change which
points to sock_def_wakeup() which issues a wakeup unconditionally
(without event mask).
Signed-off-by: Vakul Garg <vakul.garg@nxp.com>
---
v6->v7: Improved the commit message to contain the detailed reasoning.
(The same analysis was shared on the mail list.)
net/tls/tls_sw.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/net/tls/tls_sw.c b/net/tls/tls_sw.c
index 6deceb7c56ba..33838f11fafa 100644
--- a/net/tls/tls_sw.c
+++ b/net/tls/tls_sw.c
@@ -1028,7 +1028,7 @@ static void tls_queue(struct strparser *strp, struct sk_buff *skb)
ctx->recv_pkt = skb;
strp_pause(strp);
- strp->sk->sk_state_change(strp->sk);
+ ctx->saved_data_ready(strp->sk);
}
static void tls_data_ready(struct sock *sk)
--
2.13.6
next reply other threads:[~2018-07-30 6:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-07-30 10:38 Vakul Garg [this message]
2018-07-30 16:42 ` [PATCH net-next v7] net/tls: Use socket data_ready callback on record availability David Miller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180730103833.6585-1-vakul.garg@nxp.com \
--to=vakul.garg@nxp.com \
--cc=aviadye@mellanox.com \
--cc=borisp@mellanox.com \
--cc=davejwatson@fb.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).