From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Pavel Machek Subject: [PATCH] RDS is not Radio Data System Date: Sun, 5 Aug 2018 08:59:21 +0200 Message-ID: <20180805065920.GA8968@amd> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="k+w/mQv8wyuph6w0" Cc: Netdev list To: ka-cheong.poon@oracle.com, santosh.shilimkar@oracle.com, kernel list , Netdev list Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org --k+w/mQv8wyuph6w0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi! Getting prompt "The RDS Protocol" (RDS) is not too helpful, and it is easily confused with Radio Data System (which we may want to support in kernel, too). I wonder if option should be named NET_RDS, instead? And this sounds like a good idea: (Plus, we normally have "module will be called foobar" and if unsure say X. What happened to those?) diff --git a/net/rds/Kconfig b/net/rds/Kconfig index 41f7556..2738f14 100644 --- a/net/rds/Kconfig +++ b/net/rds/Kconfig @@ -1,6 +1,6 @@ =20 config RDS - tristate "The RDS Protocol" + tristate "The Reliable Datagram Sockets (RDS) Protocol" depends on INET ---help--- The RDS (Reliable Datagram Sockets) protocol provides reliable, --=20 (english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek (cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blo= g.html --k+w/mQv8wyuph6w0 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1 iEYEARECAAYFAltmoEgACgkQMOfwapXb+vKTVACgthcMj86QoZHXuIFQSWSQh5GK sDAAmwe6rN3GP1s8UFewrOtWpQok/Y+6 =jUVb -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --k+w/mQv8wyuph6w0--