From: Stefano Brivio <sbrivio@redhat.com>
To: Pravin Shelar <pshelar@ovn.org>
Cc: Matteo Croce <mcroce@redhat.com>,
Justin Pettit <jpettit@vmware.com>,
Greg Rose <gvrose8192@gmail.com>, Ben Pfaff <blp@ovn.org>,
netdev <netdev@vger.kernel.org>, ovs dev <dev@openvswitch.org>,
Jiri Benc <jbenc@redhat.com>, Aaron <aconole@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC net-next] openvswitch: Queue upcalls to userspace in per-port round-robin order
Date: Tue, 7 Aug 2018 15:39:23 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180807153923.61a0cfda@epycfail> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180807153111.53b0da8d@epycfail>
On Tue, 7 Aug 2018 15:31:11 +0200
Stefano Brivio <sbrivio@redhat.com> wrote:
> I would instead try to address the concerns that you had about the
> original patch adding fairness in the kernel, rather than trying to
> make the issue appear less severe in ovs-vswitchd.
And, by the way, if we introduce a way to configure the possible
fairness algorithms via netlink, we can also rather easily allow
ovs-vswitchd to disable fairness on kernel side altogether, should it
be needed.
--
Stefano
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-08-07 15:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-07-04 14:23 [PATCH RFC net-next] openvswitch: Queue upcalls to userspace in per-port round-robin order Matteo Croce
[not found] ` <20180704142342.21740-1-mcroce-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
2018-07-10 18:31 ` Pravin Shelar
2018-07-16 16:54 ` Matteo Croce
2018-07-31 19:43 ` Matteo Croce
[not found] ` <CAGnkfhyxQSz=8OsgTsjR3NfZ2FPwv+FjPZNPEY5VHZRsEiQ68w-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
2018-07-31 22:06 ` Ben Pfaff
2018-08-03 16:52 ` Stefano Brivio
2018-08-03 23:01 ` Ben Pfaff
2018-08-04 0:43 ` Stefano Brivio
2018-08-04 0:54 ` Ben Pfaff
2018-08-10 14:11 ` William Tu
2018-08-14 15:25 ` Stefano Brivio
2018-07-31 23:12 ` Pravin Shelar
2018-08-07 13:31 ` Stefano Brivio
2018-08-07 13:39 ` Stefano Brivio [this message]
2018-08-15 7:19 ` Pravin Shelar
[not found] ` <CAOrHB_DaA-+J=jzNOdQiUYrA7RJi30HmRESjsmGs7_z1ffpVOA-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
2018-08-16 21:07 ` Stefano Brivio
2018-09-26 9:58 ` Stefano Brivio
2018-09-28 17:15 ` Pravin Shelar
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180807153923.61a0cfda@epycfail \
--to=sbrivio@redhat.com \
--cc=aconole@redhat.com \
--cc=blp@ovn.org \
--cc=dev@openvswitch.org \
--cc=gvrose8192@gmail.com \
--cc=jbenc@redhat.com \
--cc=jpettit@vmware.com \
--cc=mcroce@redhat.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pshelar@ovn.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).