[PATCH net-next 4/7] selftests: mlxsw: Add TC flower test for Spectrum-2

[Ido Schimmel <idosch@mellanox.com>]

Signed-off-by: Ido Schimmel <idosch@mellanox.com>
Reviewed-by: Jiri Pirko <jiri@mellanox.com>
---
 .../drivers/net/mlxsw/spectrum-2/tc_flower.sh | 366 ++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 366 insertions(+)
 create mode 100755 tools/testing/selftests/drivers/net/mlxsw/spectrum-2/tc_flower.sh

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/drivers/net/mlxsw/spectrum-2/tc_flower.sh b/tools/testing/selftests/drivers/net/mlxsw/spectrum-2/tc_flower.sh
new file mode 100755
index 000000000000..3b75180f455d
--- /dev/null
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/drivers/net/mlxsw/spectrum-2/tc_flower.sh
@@ -0,0 +1,366 @@
+#!/bin/bash
+# SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
+
+# This test is for checking the A-TCAM and C-TCAM operation in Spectrum-2.
+# It tries to exercise as many code paths in the eRP state machine as
+# possible.
+
+lib_dir=$(dirname $0)/../../../../net/forwarding
+
+ALL_TESTS="single_mask_test identical_filters_test two_masks_test \
+	multiple_masks_test ctcam_edge_cases_test"
+NUM_NETIFS=2
+source $lib_dir/tc_common.sh
+source $lib_dir/lib.sh
+
+tcflags="skip_hw"
+
+h1_create()
+{
+	simple_if_init $h1 192.0.2.1/24 198.51.100.1/24
+}
+
+h1_destroy()
+{
+	simple_if_fini $h1 192.0.2.1/24 198.51.100.1/24
+}
+
+h2_create()
+{
+	simple_if_init $h2 192.0.2.2/24 198.51.100.2/24
+	tc qdisc add dev $h2 clsact
+}
+
+h2_destroy()
+{
+	tc qdisc del dev $h2 clsact
+	simple_if_fini $h2 192.0.2.2/24 198.51.100.2/24
+}
+
+single_mask_test()
+{
+	# When only a single mask is required, the device uses the master
+	# mask and not the eRP table. Verify that under this mode the right
+	# filter is matched
+
+	RET=0
+
+	tc filter add dev $h2 ingress protocol ip pref 1 handle 101 flower \
+		$tcflags dst_ip 192.0.2.2 action drop
+
+	$MZ $h1 -c 1 -p 64 -a $h1mac -b $h2mac -A 192.0.2.1 -B 192.0.2.2 \
+		-t ip -q
+
+	tc_check_packets "dev $h2 ingress" 101 1
+	check_err $? "Single filter - did not match"
+
+	tc filter add dev $h2 ingress protocol ip pref 2 handle 102 flower \
+		$tcflags dst_ip 198.51.100.2 action drop
+
+	$MZ $h1 -c 1 -p 64 -a $h1mac -b $h2mac -A 192.0.2.1 -B 192.0.2.2 \
+		-t ip -q
+
+	tc_check_packets "dev $h2 ingress" 101 2
+	check_err $? "Two filters - did not match highest priority"
+
+	$MZ $h1 -c 1 -p 64 -a $h1mac -b $h2mac -A 198.51.100.1 -B 198.51.100.2 \
+		-t ip -q
+
+	tc_check_packets "dev $h2 ingress" 102 1
+	check_err $? "Two filters - did not match lowest priority"
+
+	tc filter del dev $h2 ingress protocol ip pref 1 handle 101 flower
+
+	$MZ $h1 -c 1 -p 64 -a $h1mac -b $h2mac -A 198.51.100.1 -B 198.51.100.2 \
+		-t ip -q
+
+	tc_check_packets "dev $h2 ingress" 102 2
+	check_err $? "Single filter - did not match after delete"
+
+	tc filter del dev $h2 ingress protocol ip pref 2 handle 102 flower
+
+	log_test "single mask test ($tcflags)"
+}
+
+identical_filters_test()
+{
+	# When two filters that only differ in their priority are used,
+	# one needs to be inserted into the C-TCAM. This test verifies
+	# that filters are correctly spilled to C-TCAM and that the right
+	# filter is matched
+
+	RET=0
+
+	tc filter add dev $h2 ingress protocol ip pref 1 handle 101 flower \
+		$tcflags dst_ip 192.0.2.2 action drop
+	tc filter add dev $h2 ingress protocol ip pref 2 handle 102 flower \
+		$tcflags dst_ip 192.0.2.2 action drop
+
+	$MZ $h1 -c 1 -p 64 -a $h1mac -b $h2mac -A 192.0.2.1 -B 192.0.2.2 \
+		-t ip -q
+
+	tc_check_packets "dev $h2 ingress" 101 1
+	check_err $? "Did not match A-TCAM filter"
+
+	tc filter del dev $h2 ingress protocol ip pref 1 handle 101 flower
+
+	$MZ $h1 -c 1 -p 64 -a $h1mac -b $h2mac -A 192.0.2.1 -B 192.0.2.2 \
+		-t ip -q
+
+	tc_check_packets "dev $h2 ingress" 102 1
+	check_err $? "Did not match C-TCAM filter after A-TCAM delete"
+
+	tc filter add dev $h2 ingress protocol ip pref 3 handle 103 flower \
+		$tcflags dst_ip 192.0.2.2 action drop
+
+	$MZ $h1 -c 1 -p 64 -a $h1mac -b $h2mac -A 192.0.2.1 -B 192.0.2.2 \
+		-t ip -q
+
+	tc_check_packets "dev $h2 ingress" 102 2
+	check_err $? "Did not match C-TCAM filter after A-TCAM add"
+
+	tc filter del dev $h2 ingress protocol ip pref 2 handle 102 flower
+
+	$MZ $h1 -c 1 -p 64 -a $h1mac -b $h2mac -A 192.0.2.1 -B 192.0.2.2 \
+		-t ip -q
+
+	tc_check_packets "dev $h2 ingress" 103 1
+	check_err $? "Did not match A-TCAM filter after C-TCAM delete"
+
+	tc filter del dev $h2 ingress protocol ip pref 3 handle 103 flower
+
+	log_test "identical filters test ($tcflags)"
+}
+
+two_masks_test()
+{
+	# When more than one mask is required, the eRP table is used. This
+	# test verifies that the eRP table is correctly allocated and used
+
+	RET=0
+
+	tc filter add dev $h2 ingress protocol ip pref 1 handle 101 flower \
+		$tcflags dst_ip 192.0.2.2 action drop
+	tc filter add dev $h2 ingress protocol ip pref 3 handle 103 flower \
+		$tcflags dst_ip 192.0.0.0/16 action drop
+
+	$MZ $h1 -c 1 -p 64 -a $h1mac -b $h2mac -A 192.0.2.1 -B 192.0.2.2 \
+		-t ip -q
+
+	tc_check_packets "dev $h2 ingress" 101 1
+	check_err $? "Two filters - did not match highest priority"
+
+	tc filter del dev $h2 ingress protocol ip pref 1 handle 101 flower
+
+	$MZ $h1 -c 1 -p 64 -a $h1mac -b $h2mac -A 192.0.2.1 -B 192.0.2.2 \
+		-t ip -q
+
+	tc_check_packets "dev $h2 ingress" 103 1
+	check_err $? "Single filter - did not match"
+
+	tc filter add dev $h2 ingress protocol ip pref 2 handle 102 flower \
+		$tcflags dst_ip 192.0.2.0/24 action drop
+
+	$MZ $h1 -c 1 -p 64 -a $h1mac -b $h2mac -A 192.0.2.1 -B 192.0.2.2 \
+		-t ip -q
+
+	tc_check_packets "dev $h2 ingress" 102 1
+	check_err $? "Two filters - did not match highest priority after add"
+
+	tc filter del dev $h2 ingress protocol ip pref 3 handle 103 flower
+	tc filter del dev $h2 ingress protocol ip pref 2 handle 102 flower
+
+	log_test "two masks test ($tcflags)"
+}
+
+multiple_masks_test()
+{
+	# The number of masks in a region is limited. Once the maximum
+	# number of masks has been reached filters that require new
+	# masks are spilled to the C-TCAM. This test verifies that
+	# spillage is performed correctly and that the right filter is
+	# matched
+
+	local index
+
+	RET=0
+
+	NUM_MASKS=32
+	BASE_INDEX=100
+
+	for i in $(eval echo {1..$NUM_MASKS}); do
+		index=$((BASE_INDEX - i))
+
+		tc filter add dev $h2 ingress protocol ip pref $index \
+			handle $index \
+			flower $tcflags dst_ip 192.0.2.2/${i} src_ip 192.0.2.1 \
+			action drop
+
+		$MZ $h1 -c 1 -p 64 -a $h1mac -b $h2mac -A 192.0.2.1 \
+			-B 192.0.2.2 -t ip -q
+
+		tc_check_packets "dev $h2 ingress" $index 1
+		check_err $? "$i filters - did not match highest priority (add)"
+	done
+
+	for i in $(eval echo {$NUM_MASKS..1}); do
+		index=$((BASE_INDEX - i))
+
+		$MZ $h1 -c 1 -p 64 -a $h1mac -b $h2mac -A 192.0.2.1 \
+			-B 192.0.2.2 -t ip -q
+
+		tc_check_packets "dev $h2 ingress" $index 2
+		check_err $? "$i filters - did not match highest priority (del)"
+
+		tc filter del dev $h2 ingress protocol ip pref $index \
+			handle $index flower
+	done
+
+	log_test "multiple masks test ($tcflags)"
+}
+
+ctcam_two_atcam_masks_test()
+{
+	RET=0
+
+	# First case: C-TCAM is disabled when there are two A-TCAM masks.
+	# We push a filter into the C-TCAM by using two identical filters
+	# as in identical_filters_test()
+
+	# Filter goes into A-TCAM
+	tc filter add dev $h2 ingress protocol ip pref 1 handle 101 flower \
+		$tcflags dst_ip 192.0.2.2 action drop
+	# Filter goes into C-TCAM
+	tc filter add dev $h2 ingress protocol ip pref 2 handle 102 flower \
+		$tcflags dst_ip 192.0.2.2 action drop
+	# Filter goes into A-TCAM
+	tc filter add dev $h2 ingress protocol ip pref 3 handle 103 flower \
+		$tcflags dst_ip 192.0.2.0/24 action drop
+
+	$MZ $h1 -c 1 -p 64 -a $h1mac -b $h2mac -A 192.0.2.1 -B 192.0.2.2 \
+		-t ip -q
+
+	tc_check_packets "dev $h2 ingress" 101 1
+	check_err $? "Did not match A-TCAM filter"
+
+	# Delete both A-TCAM and C-TCAM filters and make sure the remaining
+	# A-TCAM filter still works
+	tc filter del dev $h2 ingress protocol ip pref 2 handle 102 flower
+	tc filter del dev $h2 ingress protocol ip pref 1 handle 101 flower
+
+	$MZ $h1 -c 1 -p 64 -a $h1mac -b $h2mac -A 192.0.2.1 -B 192.0.2.2 \
+		-t ip -q
+
+	tc_check_packets "dev $h2 ingress" 103 1
+	check_err $? "Did not match A-TCAM filter"
+
+	tc filter del dev $h2 ingress protocol ip pref 3 handle 103 flower
+
+	log_test "ctcam with two atcam masks test ($tcflags)"
+}
+
+ctcam_one_atcam_mask_test()
+{
+	RET=0
+
+	# Second case: C-TCAM is disabled when there is one A-TCAM mask.
+	# The test is similar to identical_filters_test()
+
+	# Filter goes into A-TCAM
+	tc filter add dev $h2 ingress protocol ip pref 2 handle 102 flower \
+		$tcflags dst_ip 192.0.2.2 action drop
+	# Filter goes into C-TCAM
+	tc filter add dev $h2 ingress protocol ip pref 1 handle 101 flower \
+		$tcflags dst_ip 192.0.2.2 action drop
+
+	$MZ $h1 -c 1 -p 64 -a $h1mac -b $h2mac -A 192.0.2.1 -B 192.0.2.2 \
+		-t ip -q
+
+	tc_check_packets "dev $h2 ingress" 101 1
+	check_err $? "Did not match C-TCAM filter"
+
+	tc filter del dev $h2 ingress protocol ip pref 1 handle 101 flower
+
+	$MZ $h1 -c 1 -p 64 -a $h1mac -b $h2mac -A 192.0.2.1 -B 192.0.2.2 \
+		-t ip -q
+
+	tc_check_packets "dev $h2 ingress" 102 1
+	check_err $? "Did not match A-TCAM filter"
+
+	tc filter del dev $h2 ingress protocol ip pref 2 handle 102 flower
+
+	log_test "ctcam with one atcam mask test ($tcflags)"
+}
+
+ctcam_no_atcam_masks_test()
+{
+	RET=0
+
+	# Third case: C-TCAM is disabled when there are no A-TCAM masks
+	# This test exercises the code path that transitions the eRP table
+	# to its initial state after deleting the last C-TCAM mask
+
+	# Filter goes into A-TCAM
+	tc filter add dev $h2 ingress protocol ip pref 1 handle 101 flower \
+		$tcflags dst_ip 192.0.2.2 action drop
+	# Filter goes into C-TCAM
+	tc filter add dev $h2 ingress protocol ip pref 2 handle 102 flower \
+		$tcflags dst_ip 192.0.2.2 action drop
+
+	tc filter del dev $h2 ingress protocol ip pref 1 handle 101 flower
+	tc filter del dev $h2 ingress protocol ip pref 2 handle 102 flower
+
+	log_test "ctcam with no atcam masks test ($tcflags)"
+}
+
+ctcam_edge_cases_test()
+{
+	# When the C-TCAM is disabled after deleting the last C-TCAM
+	# mask, we want to make sure the eRP state machine is put in
+	# the correct state
+
+	ctcam_two_atcam_masks_test
+	ctcam_one_atcam_mask_test
+	ctcam_no_atcam_masks_test
+}
+
+setup_prepare()
+{
+	h1=${NETIFS[p1]}
+	h2=${NETIFS[p2]}
+	h1mac=$(mac_get $h1)
+	h2mac=$(mac_get $h2)
+
+	vrf_prepare
+
+	h1_create
+	h2_create
+}
+
+cleanup()
+{
+	pre_cleanup
+
+	h2_destroy
+	h1_destroy
+
+	vrf_cleanup
+}
+
+trap cleanup EXIT
+
+setup_prepare
+setup_wait
+
+tests_run
+
+if ! tc_offload_check; then
+	check_err 1 "Could not test offloaded functionality"
+	log_test "mlxsw-specific tests for tc flower"
+	exit
+else
+	tcflags="skip_sw"
+	tests_run
+fi
+
+exit $EXIT_STATUS
-- 
2.17.1