From: Steffen Klassert <steffen.klassert@secunet.com>
To: bai <baijiaju1990@gmail.com>
Cc: <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>, <davem@davemloft.net>,
<netdev@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [BUG] net: xfrm: Two possible sleep-in-atomic-context bugs
Date: Fri, 10 Aug 2018 07:36:04 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180810053604.uopy5ziikf736p5o@gauss3.secunet.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <b74ebf58-16c0-4a51-a004-7ce9e6abde7a@gmail.com>
On Fri, Aug 10, 2018 at 10:02:42AM +0800, bai wrote:
> The code may sleep in interrupt handler.
> xfrm_trans_reinject() is an interrupt handler set in tasklet_init().
> The function call paths (from bottom to top) in Linux-4.16 are:
>
> [FUNC] schedule_timeout
> net/core/sock.c, 2044: schedule_timeout in sock_wait_for_wmem
> net/core/sock.c, 2083: sock_wait_for_wmem in sock_alloc_send_pskb
> net/core/sock.c, 2102: sock_alloc_send_pskb in sock_alloc_send_skb
> net/ipv6/mcast.c, 1989: sock_alloc_send_skb in igmp6_send
igmp6_send calls sock_alloc_send_skb with 'noblock = 1',
this means that sock_wait_for_wmem is not executed in
sock_alloc_send_pskb.
> net/ipv6/mcast.c, 2391: igmp6_send in igmp6_join_group
> net/ipv6/mcast.c, 670: igmp6_join_group in igmp6_group_added
> net/ipv6/mcast.c, 914: igmp6_group_added in ipv6_dev_mc_inc
> net/ipv6/ndisc.c, 379: ipv6_dev_mc_inc in pndisc_constructor
> net/core/neighbour.c, 640: [FUNC_PTR]pndisc_constructor in pneigh_lookup
> net/ipv6/ip6_output.c, 483: pneigh_lookup in ip6_forward
> ./include/net/dst.h, 449: [FUNC_PTR]ip6_forward in dst_input
> net/ipv6/ip6_input.c, 71: dst_input in ip6_rcv_finish
> net/xfrm/xfrm_input.c, 511: [FUNC_PTR]ip6_rcv_finish in xfrm_trans_reinject
>
> [FUNC] kmalloc(GFP_KERNEL)
> net/core/neighbour.c, 630: kmalloc in pneigh_lookup
> net/ipv6/ip6_output.c, 483: pneigh_lookup in ip6_forward
ip6_forward calls pneigh_lookup with 'creat = 0',
this means that pneigh_lookup does not do the kmalloc.
> ./include/net/dst.h, 449: [FUNC_PTR]ip6_forward in dst_input
> net/ipv6/ip6_input.c, 71: dst_input in ip6_rcv_finish
> net/xfrm/xfrm_input.c, 511: [FUNC_PTR]ip6_rcv_finish in xfrm_trans_reinject
>
> Note that [FUNC_PTR] means a function pointer call is used.
>
> I do not find a good way to fix them, so I only report.
> These possible bugs are found by my static analysis tool (DSAC) and checked
> by my code review.
Both codepaths are ok, maybe you should fix your tool ;-)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-08-10 5:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-08-10 2:02 [BUG] net: xfrm: Two possible sleep-in-atomic-context bugs bai
2018-08-10 5:36 ` Steffen Klassert [this message]
2018-08-10 7:30 ` Jia-Ju Bai
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180810053604.uopy5ziikf736p5o@gauss3.secunet.de \
--to=steffen.klassert@secunet.com \
--cc=baijiaju1990@gmail.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=herbert@gondor.apana.org.au \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox