From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Carlos Neira Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next] BPF: helpers: New helper to obtain namespace data from current task Date: Fri, 10 Aug 2018 15:08:47 -0400 Message-ID: <20180810190847.skltdgal7dbwr35b@krondor> References: <20180809131800.11338-1-cneirabustos@gmail.com> <20180809154653.40396ce3@redhat.com> <20180809160700.mrs6gcdcghrxex7z@krondor> <20180810124029.4d2c6c1f@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Carlos Neira , netdev@vger.kernel.org, ebiederm@xmission.com, quentin.monnet@netronome.com, ys114321@gmail.com, Daniel Borkmann To: Jesper Dangaard Brouer Return-path: Received: from mail-qt0-f193.google.com ([209.85.216.193]:33229 "EHLO mail-qt0-f193.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726997AbeHJVkF (ORCPT ); Fri, 10 Aug 2018 17:40:05 -0400 Received: by mail-qt0-f193.google.com with SMTP id c15-v6so11447931qtp.0 for ; Fri, 10 Aug 2018 12:08:56 -0700 (PDT) Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20180810124029.4d2c6c1f@redhat.com> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Jesper, I'm sorry, thanks a lot for the pointers to the current process. I just submitted v2 of for this patch. Thanks again for checking this out. Bests On Fri, Aug 10, 2018 at 12:40:29PM +0200, Jesper Dangaard Brouer wrote: > On Thu, 9 Aug 2018 12:07:00 -0400 > Carlos Neira wrote: > > > Jesper, > > Here is the updated patch. > > > > From 92633f6819423093932e8d04aa3dc99a5913f6fd Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 > > From: Carlos Neira > > Date: Thu, 9 Aug 2018 09:55:32 -0400 > > Subject: [PATCH bpf-next] BPF: helpers: New helper to obtain namespace > > data from current task > > > [...] > > Hi Carlos, > > This is not how you resubmit a patch, it is both documented in [1] and > [2], that: "In case the patch or patch series has to be reworked and > sent out again in a second or later revision, it is also required to > add a version number (v2, v3, ...) into the subject prefix" > > [1] https://github.com/torvalds/linux/blob/master/Documentation/bpf/bpf_devel_QA.rst#q-how-do-i-indicate-which-tree-bpf-vs-bpf-next-my-patch-should-be-applied-to > > [2] https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/process/submitting-patches.html#the-canonical-patch-format > > Take a look at [1], which toplevel doc is about "HOWTO interact with > BPF subsystem". > > -- > Best regards, > Jesper Dangaard Brouer > MSc.CS, Principal Kernel Engineer at Red Hat > LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/brouer