From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] wimax: usb-fw: mark expected switch
 fall-through
Date: Sat, 11 Aug 2018 11:30:00 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <20180811.113000.647008252380298069.davem@davemloft.net>
References: <20180809153944.GA16703@embeddedor.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: inaky.perez-gonzalez@intel.com, linux-wimax@intel.com,
        netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
To: gustavo@embeddedor.com
Return-path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
In-Reply-To: <20180809153944.GA16703@embeddedor.com>
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org

From: "Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavo@embeddedor.com>
Date: Thu, 9 Aug 2018 10:39:44 -0500

> In preparation to enabling -Wimplicit-fallthrough, mark switch cases
> where we are expecting to fall through.
> 
> Notice that in this particular case, I placed the "fall through"
> annotation at the bottom of the case, which is what GCC is expecting
> to find.
> 
> Addresses-Coverity-ID: 1369529 ("Missing break in switch")
> Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@embeddedor.com>

Applied.