From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Tobin C. Harding" Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next 0/4] Convert filter.txt to RST Date: Sat, 11 Aug 2018 21:50:58 +1000 Message-ID: <20180811115058.GN32374@eros> References: <20180809052328.27942-1-me@tobin.cc> <20180809060734.rtqqu4sexbwzuqmm@ast-mbp> <20180809072753.GF32374@eros> <80bdc251-9f57-602f-6536-b34651684bb7@iogearbox.net> <20180810014636.GJ32374@eros> <20180810065752.2ab5473d@lwn.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Jonathan Corbet , Daniel Borkmann , Alexei Starovoitov , "David S. Miller" , Kees Cook , Andy Lutomirski , Will Drewry , linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, Network Development , LKML To: Alexei Starovoitov Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org On Fri, Aug 10, 2018 at 10:51:28AM -0700, Alexei Starovoitov wrote: > On Fri, Aug 10, 2018 at 5:57 AM Jonathan Corbet wrote: > > > > The objective actually is to have SPDX tags in all files in the kernel. > > That includes documentation, even though people, as always, care less > > about the docs than they do the code. > > right, but let's do that as a separate patch set. > In the current set I'd focus on reviewing the actual doc changes. > In particular completely removing > Documentation/networking/filter.txt > feels wrong, since lots of websites point directly there. > Can we have at least few words there pointing to new location? Something like ... ------------ filter.txt BPF documentation can now be found in the following places: - Introduction to BPF (Linux Socket Filter) - Documentation/userspace-api/socket-filter.rst - Classic BPF (cBPF) - Documentation/userspace-api/cBPF.rst - Internal BPF (eBPF) - Documentation/userspace-api/eBPF.rst - SECCOMP BPF - Documentation/userspace-api/seccomp_filter.rst - BPF Design Q&A - Documentation/bpf/bpf_design_QA.rst - BPF Development Q&A - Documentation/bpf/bpf_devel_QA.rst ------------- Also this highlights that bpf/index.rst is not quite correct yet in this set. The Q&A files are indexed but not explicitly mentioned. My feeling is that bpf/index.rst should mirror the information above. thanks, Tobin.