From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Dominique Martinet Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] 9p updates for 4.19 Date: Fri, 17 Aug 2018 23:36:48 +0200 Message-ID: <20180817213648.GA31406@nautica> References: <20180813012347.GA32555@nautica> <20180817023307.GA32726@nautica> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Cc: V9FS Developers , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Network Development To: Linus Torvalds Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org Linus Torvalds wrote on Fri, Aug 17, 2018: > So this pull request confuses me, and that's not a good thing. I'll hopefully do better next time! Thank you for taking the time to explain. > On Thu, Aug 16, 2018 at 7:33 PM Dominique Martinet > wrote: > > > > Pull request for inclusion in 4.19 for 9p > > So when I pull the tag, I get a different message, talking about > > This tag is the same as 9p-for-4.19 without the two MAINTAINERS patches > > but I never saw a first version. I thought the the same thing (that you never saw the first version) when I wrote the request-pull email and adjusted the text -- I wasn't aware the tag should have the same text as the mail but will pay attention to that in the future, it does make sense. For the background, I had used 9p-for-4.19 in a mail to v9fs-developer asking for testing earlier this week, it is still in the repo as another signed tag if you'd like to confirm. I removed the "MAINTAINERS patches" when Andrew picked them up shortly after the original mail and made the second tag back then. > And it comes from a github address, with a pgp key that I've not seen > before, and without me having been told about said maintainership > updates. And while the key has a lot of signatures, none of them are > any that I have recognized previously from kernel development. I agree on this point, and will have a different key with at least some kernel developers signatures for 4.20 (which will be confusing again as my key changes, but at least it shold have people you recognize). I cannot say anything other than "I was not sufficiently prepared" for 4.19 and used whatever key I normally use after checking on pathfinder that it was still "closeish" to you. On the maintainership update, while it wasn't direct I believe Andrew brought it up when adding me to the Cc of a 9p security report after you added the current maintainers recently -- but, well, yes, it's not like being told directly. He has the MAINTAINER file update and am sure will send it to you shortly so if preferable I can wait until he sends them to you and send this PR (with a better tag) again at this point? Thank you, -- Dominique Martinet