From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Subject: Re: any reason for "!!netif_carrier_ok" and "!!netif_dormant" in
 net-sysfs.c?
Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2018 09:04:24 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <20180827.090424.977658416500279863.davem@davemloft.net>
References: <alpine.LFD.2.21.1808270448030.28019@localhost.localdomain>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org
To: rpjday@crashcourse.ca
Return-path: <netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from shards.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.9]:57100 "EHLO
        shards.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
        with ESMTP id S1727029AbeH0Tvk (ORCPT
        <rfc822;netdev@vger.kernel.org>); Mon, 27 Aug 2018 15:51:40 -0400
In-Reply-To: <alpine.LFD.2.21.1808270448030.28019@localhost.localdomain>
Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <netdev.vger.kernel.org>

From: "Robert P. J. Day" <rpjday@crashcourse.ca>
Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2018 04:55:29 -0400 (EDT)

>   another pedantic oddity -- is there a reason for these two double
> negations in net/core/net-sysfs.c?

It turns an arbitrary integer into a boolean, this is a common
construct across the kernel tree so I'm surprised you've never seen
it before.

Although, I don't know how much more hand holding we're willing to
tolerate continuing to give to you at this point.

Thanks.