From: Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>
To: Jisheng Zhang <Jisheng.Zhang@synaptics.com>
Cc: thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Gregory CLEMENT <gregory.clement@bootlin.com>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/5] net: mvneta: enable NETIF_F_RXCSUM by default
Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2018 15:08:36 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180829130836.GD1955@lunn.ch> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180829162932.6015e89d@xhacker.debian>
On Wed, Aug 29, 2018 at 04:29:32PM +0800, Jisheng Zhang wrote:
> The code and HW supports NETIF_F_RXCSUM, so let's enable it by default.
Hi Jisheng
I've never studied what all these different flags mean. Does
NETIF_F_RXCSUM mean Ethernet FCS? Or does it also include IPv4, IPv6,
UDP, TCP... checksums?
I've seen network interfaces get checksum'ing wrong when used with an
Ethernet switch with DSA. The extra header DSA uses means the hardware
cannot parse the packet correctly, and so cannot find these headers.
If this is just for FCS, then it is not a problem.
Thanks
Andrew
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-08-29 13:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-08-29 8:25 [PATCH 0/5] net: mvneta: some bug fix and trivial improvement Jisheng Zhang
2018-08-29 8:27 ` [PATCH 1/5] net: mvneta: fix rx_offset_correction set and usage Jisheng Zhang
2018-08-29 9:05 ` Gregory CLEMENT
2018-08-29 9:16 ` Jisheng Zhang
2018-08-29 8:27 ` [PATCH 2/5] net: mvneta: fix the wrong function to unmap rx buf Jisheng Zhang
2018-08-29 9:21 ` Gregory CLEMENT
2018-08-30 3:40 ` Jisheng Zhang
2018-08-29 8:28 ` [PATCH 3/5] net: mvneta: Don't check NETIF_F_GRO ourself Jisheng Zhang
2018-08-29 9:37 ` Gregory CLEMENT
2018-08-29 8:29 ` [PATCH 4/5] net: mvneta: enable NETIF_F_RXCSUM by default Jisheng Zhang
2018-08-29 9:38 ` Gregory CLEMENT
2018-08-29 13:08 ` Andrew Lunn [this message]
2018-08-30 3:27 ` Jisheng Zhang
2018-08-30 3:44 ` Andrew Lunn
2018-08-29 8:30 ` [PATCH 5/5] net: mvneta: reduce smp_processor_id() calling in mvneta_tx_done_gbe Jisheng Zhang
2018-08-29 9:44 ` Gregory CLEMENT
2018-08-29 8:40 ` [PATCH 0/5] net: mvneta: some bug fix and trivial improvement Jisheng Zhang
2018-08-29 8:51 ` Jisheng Zhang
2018-08-30 3:53 ` Jisheng Zhang
2018-08-29 13:12 ` Andrew Lunn
2018-08-30 3:42 ` Jisheng Zhang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180829130836.GD1955@lunn.ch \
--to=andrew@lunn.ch \
--cc=Jisheng.Zhang@synaptics.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=gregory.clement@bootlin.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).