From: Al Viro <viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
To: netdev@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Jamal Hadi Salim <jhs@mojatatu.com>,
Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com>,
Jiri Pirko <jiri@resnulli.us>
Subject: [PATCH net 02/13] net: sched: cls_u32: mark root hnode explicitly
Date: Sun, 9 Sep 2018 02:31:21 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180909013132.3222-3-viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180909013132.3222-1-viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
From: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
... and produce consistent error on attempt to delete such.
Existing check in u32_delete() is inconsistent - after
tc qdisc add dev eth0 ingress
tc filter add dev eth0 parent ffff: protocol ip prio 100 handle 1: u32 divisor 1
tc filter add dev eth0 parent ffff: protocol ip prio 200 handle 2: u32 divisor 1
both
tc filter delete dev eth0 parent ffff: protocol ip prio 100 handle 801: u32
and
tc filter delete dev eth0 parent ffff: protocol ip prio 100 handle 800: u32
will fail (at least with refcounting fixes), but the former will complain
about an attempt to remove a busy table, while the latter will recognize
it as root and yield "Not allowed to delete root node" instead.
The problem with the existing check is that several tcf_proto instances might
share the same tp->data and handle-to-hnode lookup will be the same for all
of them. So comparing an hnode to be deleted with tp->root won't catch the
case when one tp is used to try deleting the root of another. Solution is
trivial - mark the root hnodes explicitly upon allocation and check for that.
Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
---
net/sched/cls_u32.c | 4 +++-
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/net/sched/cls_u32.c b/net/sched/cls_u32.c
index b2c3406a2cf2..c4782aa808c7 100644
--- a/net/sched/cls_u32.c
+++ b/net/sched/cls_u32.c
@@ -84,6 +84,7 @@ struct tc_u_hnode {
int refcnt;
unsigned int divisor;
struct idr handle_idr;
+ bool is_root;
struct rcu_head rcu;
u32 flags;
/* The 'ht' field MUST be the last field in structure to allow for
@@ -377,6 +378,7 @@ static int u32_init(struct tcf_proto *tp)
root_ht->refcnt++;
root_ht->handle = tp_c ? gen_new_htid(tp_c, root_ht) : 0x80000000;
root_ht->prio = tp->prio;
+ root_ht->is_root = true;
idr_init(&root_ht->handle_idr);
if (tp_c == NULL) {
@@ -693,7 +695,7 @@ static int u32_delete(struct tcf_proto *tp, void *arg, bool *last,
goto out;
}
- if (root_ht == ht) {
+ if (ht->is_root) {
NL_SET_ERR_MSG_MOD(extack, "Not allowed to delete root node");
return -EINVAL;
}
--
2.11.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-09-09 6:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-09-09 1:31 [PATCH net 00/13] cls_u32 cleanups and fixes Al Viro
2018-09-09 1:31 ` [PATCH net 01/13] net: sched: cls_u32: fix hnode refcounting Al Viro
2018-09-09 11:37 ` Jamal Hadi Salim
2018-09-09 1:31 ` Al Viro [this message]
2018-09-09 11:39 ` [PATCH net 02/13] net: sched: cls_u32: mark root hnode explicitly Jamal Hadi Salim
2018-09-09 1:31 ` [PATCH net 03/13] net: sched: cls_u32: disallow linking to root hnode Al Viro
2018-09-09 11:39 ` Jamal Hadi Salim
2018-09-09 1:31 ` [PATCH net 04/13] net: sched: cls_u32: make sure that divisor is a power of 2 Al Viro
2018-09-09 11:41 ` Jamal Hadi Salim
2018-09-09 1:31 ` [PATCH net 05/13] net: sched: cls_u32: get rid of unused argument of u32_destroy_key() Al Viro
2018-09-09 11:41 ` Jamal Hadi Salim
2018-09-09 1:31 ` [PATCH net 06/13] net: sched: cls_u32: get rid of tc_u_knode ->tp Al Viro
2018-09-09 11:43 ` Jamal Hadi Salim
2018-09-09 1:31 ` [PATCH net 07/13] net: sched: cls_u32: get rid of tc_u_common ->rcu Al Viro
2018-09-09 11:45 ` Jamal Hadi Salim
2018-09-09 1:31 ` [PATCH net 08/13] net: sched: cls_u32: clean tc_u_common hashtable Al Viro
2018-09-09 11:47 ` Jamal Hadi Salim
2018-09-09 1:31 ` [PATCH net 09/13] net: sched: cls_u32: pass tc_u_common to u32_set_parms() instead of tc_u_hnode Al Viro
2018-09-09 11:52 ` Jamal Hadi Salim
2018-09-09 1:31 ` [PATCH net 10/13] net: sched: cls_u32: the tp_c argument of u32_set_parms() is always tp->data Al Viro
2018-09-09 12:48 ` Jamal Hadi Salim
2018-09-09 1:31 ` [PATCH net 11/13] net: sched: cls_u32: get rid of hnode ->tp_c and tp_c argument of u32_set_parms() Al Viro
2018-09-09 12:49 ` Jamal Hadi Salim
2018-09-09 1:31 ` [PATCH net 12/13] net: sched: cls_u32: keep track of knodes count in tc_u_common Al Viro
2018-09-09 12:50 ` Jamal Hadi Salim
2018-09-09 1:31 ` [PATCH net 13/13] net: sched: cls_u32: simplify the hell out u32_delete() emptiness check Al Viro
2018-09-09 12:51 ` Jamal Hadi Salim
2018-09-09 12:58 ` [PATCH net 00/13] cls_u32 cleanups and fixes Jamal Hadi Salim
2018-09-09 14:15 ` Al Viro
2018-09-09 15:48 ` Al Viro
2018-09-10 12:25 ` Offloaded u32 classifier tables WAS (Re: " Jamal Hadi Salim
2018-09-10 12:31 ` Jamal Hadi Salim
2018-09-10 11:30 ` Jamal Hadi Salim
2018-09-12 6:15 ` David Miller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180909013132.3222-3-viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk \
--to=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
--cc=jhs@mojatatu.com \
--cc=jiri@resnulli.us \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).