Re: [net-next, PATCH 2/2, v1] net: socionext: add AF_XDP support

[Ilias Apalodimas <ilias.apalodimas@linaro.org>]

> > @@ -707,6 +731,26 @@ static int netsec_process_rx(struct netsec_priv *priv, int budget)
> >  		if (unlikely(!buf_addr))
> >  			break;
> >  
> > +		if (xdp_prog) {
> > +			xdp_result = netsec_run_xdp(desc, priv, xdp_prog,
> > +						    pkt_len);
> > +			if (xdp_result != NETSEC_XDP_PASS) {
> > +				xdp_flush |= xdp_result & NETSEC_XDP_REDIR;
> > +
> > +				dma_unmap_single_attrs(priv->dev,
> > +						       desc->dma_addr,
> > +						       desc->len, DMA_TO_DEVICE,
> > +						       DMA_ATTR_SKIP_CPU_SYNC);
> > +
> > +				desc->len = desc_len;
> > +				desc->dma_addr = dma_handle;
> > +				desc->addr = buf_addr;
> > +				netsec_rx_fill(priv, idx, 1);
> > +				nsetsec_adv_desc(&dring->tail);
> > +			}
> > +			continue;
> 
> Continue even on XDP_PASS? Is this really correct?
> 
> Also seems there is no handling of adjust_head/tail for XDP_PASS case.
> 
A question on this. Should XDP related frames be allocated using 1 page
per packet?

Thanks

Ilias