From: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
To: igor.russkikh@aquantia.com
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v3 0/7] net: aquantia: implement WOL and EEE support
Date: Tue, 11 Sep 2018 23:48:20 -0700 (PDT) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180911.234820.1747706577550366387.davem@davemloft.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <cover.1536572107.git.igor.russkikh@aquantia.com>
From: Igor Russkikh <igor.russkikh@aquantia.com>
Date: Mon, 10 Sep 2018 12:39:27 +0300
> This is v3 of WOL/EEE functionality patch for atlantic driver.
>
> In this patchset Yana Esina and Nikita Danilov implemented:
>
> - Upload function to interact with FW memory
> - Definitions and structures necessary for the correct operation of Wake ON Lan
> - The functionality Wake On Lan via ethtool (Magic packet is supported)
> - The functionality for Energy-Efficient Ethernet configuration via ethtool
>
> Version 3:
> - use ETH_ALEN instead of raw number
>
> Version 2 has the following fixes:
> - patchset reorganized to extract renaming and whitespace fixes into separate
> patches
> - some of magic numbers replaced with defines
> - reverse christmas tree applied
Series applied, thanks.
> Discussion outcome regarding driver version bumps was not finished
> (here https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/954905/)
> David, could you suggest the best way to proceed on this?
Having a channel for your driver that is outside of upstream and Linux
distribution packages creates lots of problems.
When a user reports a problem with an upstream kernel, that verion
dictates which driver source was being used. There is not confusion
or ambiguity.
For a distribution kernel, the distributor hashes out which driver
they published in their kernel package when evaluating a bug reported
to them.
None of these two entities is ready to evaluate and handle properly
your custom scheme.
So generally I frown against separate distribution schemes. It is
in the final analysis an inferior experience for the user because
you basically narrow all of their support channels for problems
down to you and you alone. The whole idea is to make it work the
opposite way.
So in the upstream tree, really, the driver version is pretty useless.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-09-12 11:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-09-10 9:39 [PATCH net-next v3 0/7] net: aquantia: implement WOL and EEE support Igor Russkikh
2018-09-10 9:39 ` [PATCH net-next v3 1/7] net: aquantia: fix hw_atl_utils_fw_upload_dwords Igor Russkikh
2018-09-10 9:39 ` [PATCH net-next v3 2/7] net: aquantia: definitions for WOL Igor Russkikh
2018-09-10 14:08 ` Andrew Lunn
2018-09-10 9:39 ` [PATCH net-next v3 3/7] net: aquantia: implement WOL support Igor Russkikh
2018-09-10 14:09 ` Andrew Lunn
2018-09-10 9:39 ` [PATCH net-next v3 4/7] net: aquantia: implement EEE support Igor Russkikh
2018-09-10 14:09 ` Andrew Lunn
2018-09-10 9:39 ` [PATCH net-next v3 5/7] net: aquantia: whitespace changes Igor Russkikh
2018-09-10 9:39 ` [PATCH net-next v3 6/7] net: aquantia: renaming for better visibility Igor Russkikh
2018-09-10 9:39 ` [PATCH net-next v3 7/7] net: aquantia: bump driver version Igor Russkikh
2018-09-12 6:48 ` David Miller [this message]
2018-09-12 11:42 ` [PATCH net-next v3 0/7] net: aquantia: implement WOL and EEE support Igor Russkikh
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180911.234820.1747706577550366387.davem@davemloft.net \
--to=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=igor.russkikh@aquantia.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).