From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v3 17/17] net: WireGuard secure network tunnel
Date: Tue, 11 Sep 2018 23:55:40 +0200
Message-ID: <20180911215540.GC32007@lunn.ch>
References: <20180911010838.8818-1-Jason@zx2c4.com>
 <20180911010838.8818-19-Jason@zx2c4.com>
 <20180911133017.GJ30395@lunn.ch>
 <CAHmME9pwVSeE=4aUD6RKLjE+DrHY1=3OtBS7sAvdR66gaNhNtA@mail.gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        Netdev <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
        David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: "Jason A. Donenfeld" <Jason@zx2c4.com>
Return-path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <CAHmME9pwVSeE=4aUD6RKLjE+DrHY1=3OtBS7sAvdR66gaNhNtA@mail.gmail.com>
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org

> Most uses of inline are this way after checking the compiler output on
> several platforms. (Generally my build-run-test cycle is actually
> build-IDAPro-run-test.) If you feel that's been done too liberally,
> I'm happy to spend time rechecking each use case.

Hi Jason

I really expect DaveM is going to come along and tell you to remove
them all.

You need a strong argument that they are needed, since this goes
against the general consensus in the kernel, that the compiler is
better at this than humans.

       Andrew