From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: David Miller Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next V2 00/11] vhost_net TX batching Date: Thu, 13 Sep 2018 11:05:44 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <20180913.110544.1829014151772495898.davem@davemloft.net> References: <20180912031709.14112-1-jasowang@redhat.com> <20180913.092819.2099750169529223026.davem@davemloft.net> <20180913135833-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org, virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org To: mst@redhat.com Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20180913135833-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: virtualization-bounces@lists.linux-foundation.org Errors-To: virtualization-bounces@lists.linux-foundation.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" Date: Thu, 13 Sep 2018 14:02:13 -0400 > On Thu, Sep 13, 2018 at 09:28:19AM -0700, David Miller wrote: >> From: Jason Wang >> Date: Wed, 12 Sep 2018 11:16:58 +0800 >> >> > This series tries to batch submitting packets to underlayer socket >> > through msg_control during sendmsg(). This is done by: >> ... >> >> Series applied, thanks Jason. > > Going over it now I don't see a lot to complain about, but I'd > appreciate a bit more time for review in the future. 3 days ok? I try to handle every patchwork entry within 48 hours, more specifically 2 business days. Given the rate at which patches flow through networking, I think this is both reasonable and necessary. One always have the option to send a quick reply to the list saying "Please wait for my review, I'll get to it in the next day or two." which I will certainly honor. Thank you.