Netdev List
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@netfilter.org>
To: dsahern@kernel.org
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org,
	ndsouza@ciena.com, idosch@mellanox.com, fw@strlen.de,
	David Ahern <dsahern@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] netfilter: bridge: Don't sabotage nf_hook calls from an l3mdev
Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2018 18:25:28 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180920162528.trzf65jjwxehgqz6@salvia> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180917152036.30674-1-dsahern@kernel.org>

On Mon, Sep 17, 2018 at 08:20:36AM -0700, dsahern@kernel.org wrote:
> From: David Ahern <dsahern@gmail.com>
> 
> For starters, the bridge netfilter code registers operations that
> are invoked any time nh_hook is called. Specifically, ip_sabotage_in
> watches for nested calls for NF_INET_PRE_ROUTING when a bridge is in
> the stack.
> 
> Packet wise, the bridge netfilter hook runs first. br_nf_pre_routing
> allocates nf_bridge, sets in_prerouting to 1 and calls NF_HOOK for
> NF_INET_PRE_ROUTING. It's finish function, br_nf_pre_routing_finish,
> then resets in_prerouting flag to 0 and the packet continues up the
> stack. The packet eventually makes it to the VRF driver and it invokes
> nf_hook for NF_INET_PRE_ROUTING in case any rules have been added against
> the vrf device.
> 
> Because of the registered operations the call to nf_hook causes
> ip_sabotage_in to be invoked. That function sees the nf_bridge on the
> skb and that in_prerouting is not set. Thinking it is an invalid nested
> call it steals (drops) the packet.
> 
> Update ip_sabotage_in to recognize that the bridge or one of its upper
> devices (e.g., vlan) can be enslaved to a VRF (L3 master device) and
> allow the packet to go through the nf_hook a second time.

Applied.

  reply	other threads:[~2018-09-20 22:09 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-09-17 15:20 [PATCH net] netfilter: bridge: Don't sabotage nf_hook calls from an l3mdev dsahern
2018-09-20 16:25 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso [this message]
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2018-09-07 22:08 dsahern
2018-09-17  4:14 ` David Ahern
2018-09-17  8:29   ` Pablo Neira Ayuso

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20180920162528.trzf65jjwxehgqz6@salvia \
    --to=pablo@netfilter.org \
    --cc=dsahern@gmail.com \
    --cc=dsahern@kernel.org \
    --cc=fw@strlen.de \
    --cc=idosch@mellanox.com \
    --cc=ndsouza@ciena.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox