From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Subject: Re: Ping: [PATCH 0/3] xen-netback: hash mapping hanling adjustments
Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2018 09:49:20 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <20180924.094920.655625438524720848.davem@davemloft.net>
References: <5B9778D702000078001E7069@prv1-mh.provo.novell.com>
        <20180911101623.3tuzvlyr7musocrg@zion.uk.xensource.com>
        <5BA895B602000078001EB059@prv1-mh.provo.novell.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: paul.durrant@citrix.com, wei.liu2@citrix.com,
        xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org
To: JBeulich@suse.com
Return-path: <netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from shards.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.9]:48968 "EHLO
        shards.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
        with ESMTP id S1728916AbeIXWwX (ORCPT
        <rfc822;netdev@vger.kernel.org>); Mon, 24 Sep 2018 18:52:23 -0400
In-Reply-To: <5BA895B602000078001EB059@prv1-mh.provo.novell.com>
Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <netdev.vger.kernel.org>

From: "Jan Beulich" <JBeulich@suse.com>
Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2018 01:43:50 -0600

>>>> On 11.09.18 at 12:16, <wei.liu2@citrix.com> wrote:
>> On Tue, Sep 11, 2018 at 02:12:07AM -0600, Jan Beulich wrote:
>>> >>> On 28.08.18 at 16:54,  wrote:
>>> > First and foremost the fix for XSA-270. On top of that further changes
>>> > which looked desirable to me while investigating that XSA.
>>> > 
>>> > 1: fix input validation in xenvif_set_hash_mapping()
>>> > 2: validate queue numbers in xenvif_set_hash_mapping()
>>> > 3: handle page straddling in xenvif_set_hash_mapping()
>>> > 
>>> > Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@suse.com>
>>> 
>>> What is the way forward here? I've got R-b-s from Paul for all three
>>> patches, and a minor change request on patch 2 from Wei. I'm not
>>> really certain what to do in this case (hints appreciated), but could
>>> at least the security fix (patch 1) be applied immediately?
>> 
>> If you happen to resend, please make the adjustment; otherwise I'm fine
>> with the patches as they are. I don't want to block useful things on
>> cosmetic issues.
> 
> Dave? I notice none of the patches is in 4.19-rc5, not even the security
> fix, the advisory for which had gone public over a month ago.

If it's not in my patchwork queue, you have to resend the series and
make it clear that it should be applied to the networking tree by
putting "[PATCH net N/M]" in the Subject lines.

Thank you.