From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/5] netlink: nested policy validation
Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2018 10:21:54 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <20180926.102154.1962354339786539715.davem@davemloft.net>
References: <20180926091534.22876-1-johannes@sipsolutions.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, dsahern@gmail.com
To: johannes@sipsolutions.net
Return-path: <netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from shards.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.9]:57454 "EHLO
        shards.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
        with ESMTP id S1726023AbeIZXfw (ORCPT
        <rfc822;netdev@vger.kernel.org>); Wed, 26 Sep 2018 19:35:52 -0400
In-Reply-To: <20180926091534.22876-1-johannes@sipsolutions.net>
Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <netdev.vger.kernel.org>

From: Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net>
Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2018 11:15:29 +0200

> This adds nested policy validation, which lets you specify the
> nested attribute type, e.g. NLA_NESTED with sub-policy, or the
> new NLA_NESTED_ARRAY with sub-sub-policy.
> 
> 
> Changes in v2:
>  * move setting the bad attr pointer/message into validate_nla()
>  * remove the recursion patch since that's no longer needed
>  * simply skip the generic bad attr pointer/message setting in
>    case of nested nla_validate() failing since that could fail
>    only due to validate_nla() failing inside, which already sets
>    the extack information
> 
> Changes in v3:
>  * fix NLA_REJECT to have an error message if none is in policy

Looks great Johannes, series applied.

Thanks!