From: Hangbin Liu <liuhangbin@gmail.com>
To: Michal Kubecek <mkubecek@suse.cz>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>,
Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org>,
David Ahern <dsahern@gmail.com>, Phil Sutter <phil@nwl.cc>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] geneve: fix ttl inherit type
Date: Sat, 29 Sep 2018 23:03:23 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180929150323.GJ24677@leo.usersys.redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180928234619.GA17323@unicorn.suse.cz>
On Sat, Sep 29, 2018 at 01:46:19AM +0200, Michal Kubecek wrote:
> Is it desirable to switch to a flag? If I read geneve_changelink() and
> geneve_nl2info() correctly, it allows you to set the ttl_inherit flag
> for an existing device but doesn't allow you to clear it. With NLA_U8,
> you could distinguish three cases: set the flag (non-zero value), clear
> the flag (zero value) and preserve current state (attribute not
> present).
>
> The same problem exists for vxlan but vxlan code intentionally disallows
> changing the flag value for an existing device (I'm not sure if it's
> because it's really impossible or just due to limits of the interface).
> Unfortunately it has been already released with NLA_FLAG in 4.18,
> AFAICS, so we have to live with it. But it's not too late for geneve.
>
> Michal Kubecek
Hi michal,
I thought about the vxlan issue and agree with you. TTL inherit is a way
to define the ttl number we should use. It also should be able to be changed
as the normal ttl. How about enabling clear ttl inherit flag like:
--- a/drivers/net/vxlan.c
+++ b/drivers/net/vxlan.c
@@ -3303,13 +3303,11 @@ static int vxlan_nl2conf(struct nlattr *tb[], struct nlattr *data[],
if (data[IFLA_VXLAN_TOS])
conf->tos = nla_get_u8(data[IFLA_VXLAN_TOS]);
- if (data[IFLA_VXLAN_TTL])
- conf->ttl = nla_get_u8(data[IFLA_VXLAN_TTL]);
-
if (data[IFLA_VXLAN_TTL_INHERIT]) {
- if (changelink)
- return -EOPNOTSUPP;
conf->flags |= VXLAN_F_TTL_INHERIT;
+ } else if (data[IFLA_VXLAN_TTL]) {
+ conf->flags &= ~VXLAN_F_TTL_INHERIT;
+ conf->ttl = nla_get_u8(data[IFLA_VXLAN_TTL]);
}
Before this fix, we disabled changing it after creating vxlan. And with this fix
we can set/unset it. I think this should not be a usage break. What do you think?
Thanks
Hangbin
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-09-29 21:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-09-28 1:09 [PATCH net-next] geneve: fix ttl inherit type Hangbin Liu
2018-09-28 10:38 ` Phil Sutter
2018-09-28 17:59 ` David Ahern
2018-09-29 9:20 ` Hangbin Liu
2018-09-28 23:46 ` Michal Kubecek
2018-09-29 9:16 ` Hangbin Liu
2018-10-01 10:56 ` Phil Sutter
2018-09-29 15:03 ` Hangbin Liu [this message]
2018-09-29 15:06 ` [PATCHv2 net-next] geneve: allow to clear ttl inherit Hangbin Liu
2018-10-04 20:55 ` David Miller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180929150323.GJ24677@leo.usersys.redhat.com \
--to=liuhangbin@gmail.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=dsahern@gmail.com \
--cc=mkubecek@suse.cz \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=phil@nwl.cc \
--cc=stephen@networkplumber.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).