From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net v2] r8169: always autoneg on resume
Date: Mon, 1 Oct 2018 04:39:47 +0200
Message-ID: <20181001023947.GA4943@lunn.ch>
References: <1538319728.z22jaatdgh.astroid@alex-desktop.none>
 <20180930221751.rd7wva3zolephj6q@scappy>
 <153834665886.421.6376790866713055481@pink.alxu.ca>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Cc: Daan Wendelen <daanwendelen@gmail.com>, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
        hkallweit1@gmail.com, nic_swsd@realtek.com, davem@davemloft.net,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
To: Alex Xu <alex_y_xu@yahoo.ca>
Return-path: <netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from vps0.lunn.ch ([185.16.172.187]:49959 "EHLO vps0.lunn.ch"
        rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
        id S1726992AbeJAJPd (ORCPT <rfc822;netdev@vger.kernel.org>);
        Mon, 1 Oct 2018 05:15:33 -0400
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <153834665886.421.6376790866713055481@pink.alxu.ca>
Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <netdev.vger.kernel.org>

On Sun, Sep 30, 2018 at 10:30:58PM +0000, Alex Xu wrote:
> Quoting Daan Wendelen (2018-09-30 22:17:51)
> > Hi Alex,
> > 
> > I randomly opened your patch even though I have absolutely no idea what this patch is about, but I
> > found a mistake in one of the comments:
> > 
> > On Sun, Sep 30, 2018 at 11:06:39AM -0400, Alex Xu (Hello71) wrote:
> > > This affects at least versions 25 and 33, so assume all cards are broken
> >                      ...
> > >        * 1GBit link after resuming from S3. For whatever reason the PHY on
> > > -      * this chip doesn't properly start a renegotiation when soft-reset.
> > > +      * these chips doesn't properly start a renegotiation when soft-reset.
> >                        ~~~~~~~ 
> > I believe it should be "these chips don't"
> > 
> > With kind regards,
> > Daan
> 
> The grammar is correct as is. The subject of the sentence is "the PHY",
> which is singular. However, I think it should be "the PHYs" instead,
> assuming that they are different.

I keep reading the patch wrong, so here is the end state:

        /* It was reported that several chips end up with 10MBit/Half on a
         * 1GBit link after resuming from S3. For whatever reason the PHY on
         * these chips doesn't properly start a renegotiation when soft-reset.
         * Explicitly requesting a renegotiation fixes this.
         */

I would also say 'don't'. For me the subject is 'PHY on these chips',
which is plural.

However:

For whatever reason the PHY, on these chips, doesn't properly start a
renegotiation when soft-reset.

Now just 'the PHY' is the subject, so singular.

But i'm just a native speaker who never actually learnt the rules of
grammar, it just sounds right or wrong, and i have no idea why.

	 Andrew