From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Jiri Benc <jbenc@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC v2 net-next 03/25] netlink: introduce
 NLM_F_DUMP_PROPER_HDR flag
Date: Tue, 2 Oct 2018 18:33:07 +0200
Message-ID: <20181002183307.52aeac07@redhat.com>
References: <20181002002851.5002-1-dsahern@kernel.org>
        <20181002002851.5002-4-dsahern@kernel.org>
        <20181002130614.77856ff8@redhat.com>
        <61bdd006-98f8-18dd-9731-b64b34e35252@gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: David Ahern <dsahern@kernel.org>, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
        davem@davemloft.net, christian@brauner.io,
        stephen@networkplumber.org
To: David Ahern <dsahern@gmail.com>
Return-path: <netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:40918 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com"
        rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
        id S1726861AbeJBXRY (ORCPT <rfc822;netdev@vger.kernel.org>);
        Tue, 2 Oct 2018 19:17:24 -0400
In-Reply-To: <61bdd006-98f8-18dd-9731-b64b34e35252@gmail.com>
Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <netdev.vger.kernel.org>

On Tue, 2 Oct 2018 08:55:19 -0600, David Ahern wrote:
> You want take issue with a name suggest a different one.

I don't have a strong opinion on this. STRICT_HDR? HDR_CHECKED?
VERIFY_HDR? If you feel that your proposal is better, I don't mind.

Thanks,

 Jiri