From: Joe Stringer <joe@wand.net.nz>
To: daniel@iogearbox.net
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, ast@kernel.org, john.fastabend@gmail.com,
tgraf@suug.ch, kafai@fb.com, nitin.hande@gmail.com,
mauricio.vasquez@polito.it
Subject: [PATCHv4 bpf-next 04/13] bpf: Generalize ptr_or_null regs check
Date: Tue, 2 Oct 2018 13:35:32 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20181002203541.26599-5-joe@wand.net.nz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20181002203541.26599-1-joe@wand.net.nz>
This check will be reused by an upcoming commit for conditional jump
checks for sockets. Refactor it a bit to simplify the later commit.
Signed-off-by: Joe Stringer <joe@wand.net.nz>
Acked-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
---
kernel/bpf/verifier.c | 43 +++++++++++++++++++++++++------------------
1 file changed, 25 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
index 8b4e70eeced2..98b218bd46e8 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
@@ -249,6 +249,11 @@ static bool type_is_pkt_pointer(enum bpf_reg_type type)
type == PTR_TO_PACKET_META;
}
+static bool reg_type_may_be_null(enum bpf_reg_type type)
+{
+ return type == PTR_TO_MAP_VALUE_OR_NULL;
+}
+
/* string representation of 'enum bpf_reg_type' */
static const char * const reg_type_str[] = {
[NOT_INIT] = "?",
@@ -3599,12 +3604,10 @@ static void reg_combine_min_max(struct bpf_reg_state *true_src,
}
}
-static void mark_map_reg(struct bpf_reg_state *regs, u32 regno, u32 id,
- bool is_null)
+static void mark_ptr_or_null_reg(struct bpf_reg_state *reg, u32 id,
+ bool is_null)
{
- struct bpf_reg_state *reg = ®s[regno];
-
- if (reg->type == PTR_TO_MAP_VALUE_OR_NULL && reg->id == id) {
+ if (reg_type_may_be_null(reg->type) && reg->id == id) {
/* Old offset (both fixed and variable parts) should
* have been known-zero, because we don't allow pointer
* arithmetic on pointers that might be NULL.
@@ -3617,11 +3620,13 @@ static void mark_map_reg(struct bpf_reg_state *regs, u32 regno, u32 id,
}
if (is_null) {
reg->type = SCALAR_VALUE;
- } else if (reg->map_ptr->inner_map_meta) {
- reg->type = CONST_PTR_TO_MAP;
- reg->map_ptr = reg->map_ptr->inner_map_meta;
- } else {
- reg->type = PTR_TO_MAP_VALUE;
+ } else if (reg->type == PTR_TO_MAP_VALUE_OR_NULL) {
+ if (reg->map_ptr->inner_map_meta) {
+ reg->type = CONST_PTR_TO_MAP;
+ reg->map_ptr = reg->map_ptr->inner_map_meta;
+ } else {
+ reg->type = PTR_TO_MAP_VALUE;
+ }
}
/* We don't need id from this point onwards anymore, thus we
* should better reset it, so that state pruning has chances
@@ -3634,8 +3639,8 @@ static void mark_map_reg(struct bpf_reg_state *regs, u32 regno, u32 id,
/* The logic is similar to find_good_pkt_pointers(), both could eventually
* be folded together at some point.
*/
-static void mark_map_regs(struct bpf_verifier_state *vstate, u32 regno,
- bool is_null)
+static void mark_ptr_or_null_regs(struct bpf_verifier_state *vstate, u32 regno,
+ bool is_null)
{
struct bpf_func_state *state = vstate->frame[vstate->curframe];
struct bpf_reg_state *reg, *regs = state->regs;
@@ -3643,14 +3648,14 @@ static void mark_map_regs(struct bpf_verifier_state *vstate, u32 regno,
int i, j;
for (i = 0; i < MAX_BPF_REG; i++)
- mark_map_reg(regs, i, id, is_null);
+ mark_ptr_or_null_reg(®s[i], id, is_null);
for (j = 0; j <= vstate->curframe; j++) {
state = vstate->frame[j];
bpf_for_each_spilled_reg(i, state, reg) {
if (!reg)
continue;
- mark_map_reg(&state->stack[i].spilled_ptr, 0, id, is_null);
+ mark_ptr_or_null_reg(reg, id, is_null);
}
}
}
@@ -3852,12 +3857,14 @@ static int check_cond_jmp_op(struct bpf_verifier_env *env,
/* detect if R == 0 where R is returned from bpf_map_lookup_elem() */
if (BPF_SRC(insn->code) == BPF_K &&
insn->imm == 0 && (opcode == BPF_JEQ || opcode == BPF_JNE) &&
- dst_reg->type == PTR_TO_MAP_VALUE_OR_NULL) {
- /* Mark all identical map registers in each branch as either
+ reg_type_may_be_null(dst_reg->type)) {
+ /* Mark all identical registers in each branch as either
* safe or unknown depending R == 0 or R != 0 conditional.
*/
- mark_map_regs(this_branch, insn->dst_reg, opcode == BPF_JNE);
- mark_map_regs(other_branch, insn->dst_reg, opcode == BPF_JEQ);
+ mark_ptr_or_null_regs(this_branch, insn->dst_reg,
+ opcode == BPF_JNE);
+ mark_ptr_or_null_regs(other_branch, insn->dst_reg,
+ opcode == BPF_JEQ);
} else if (!try_match_pkt_pointers(insn, dst_reg, ®s[insn->src_reg],
this_branch, other_branch) &&
is_pointer_value(env, insn->dst_reg)) {
--
2.17.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-10-03 3:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-10-02 20:35 [PATCHv4 bpf-next 00/13] Add socket lookup support Joe Stringer
2018-10-02 20:35 ` [PATCHv4 bpf-next 01/13] bpf: Add iterator for spilled registers Joe Stringer
2018-10-02 20:35 ` [PATCHv4 bpf-next 02/13] bpf: Simplify ptr_min_max_vals adjustment Joe Stringer
2018-10-02 20:35 ` [PATCHv4 bpf-next 03/13] bpf: Reuse canonical string formatter for ctx errs Joe Stringer
2018-10-02 20:35 ` Joe Stringer [this message]
2018-10-02 20:35 ` [PATCHv4 bpf-next 05/13] bpf: Add PTR_TO_SOCKET verifier type Joe Stringer
2018-10-02 20:35 ` [PATCHv4 bpf-next 06/13] bpf: Macrofy stack state copy Joe Stringer
2018-10-02 20:35 ` [PATCHv4 bpf-next 07/13] bpf: Add reference tracking to verifier Joe Stringer
2019-01-09 5:27 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2019-01-10 19:26 ` Joe Stringer
2018-10-02 20:35 ` [PATCHv4 bpf-next 08/13] bpf: Add helper to retrieve socket in BPF Joe Stringer
2018-10-02 20:35 ` [PATCHv4 bpf-next 09/13] selftests/bpf: Generalize dummy program types Joe Stringer
2018-10-02 20:35 ` [PATCHv4 bpf-next 10/13] selftests/bpf: Add tests for reference tracking Joe Stringer
2018-10-02 20:35 ` [PATCHv4 bpf-next 11/13] libbpf: Support loading individual progs Joe Stringer
2018-10-02 20:35 ` [PATCHv4 bpf-next 12/13] selftests/bpf: Add C tests for reference tracking Joe Stringer
2018-10-02 20:35 ` [PATCHv4 bpf-next 13/13] Documentation: Describe bpf " Joe Stringer
2018-10-03 1:08 ` [PATCHv4 bpf-next 00/13] Add socket lookup support Daniel Borkmann
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20181002203541.26599-5-joe@wand.net.nz \
--to=joe@wand.net.nz \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=john.fastabend@gmail.com \
--cc=kafai@fb.com \
--cc=mauricio.vasquez@polito.it \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nitin.hande@gmail.com \
--cc=tgraf@suug.ch \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).