netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Joe Stringer <joe@wand.net.nz>
To: daniel@iogearbox.net
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, ast@kernel.org, john.fastabend@gmail.com,
	tgraf@suug.ch, kafai@fb.com, nitin.hande@gmail.com,
	mauricio.vasquez@polito.it
Subject: [PATCHv4 bpf-next 04/13] bpf: Generalize ptr_or_null regs check
Date: Tue,  2 Oct 2018 13:35:32 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20181002203541.26599-5-joe@wand.net.nz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20181002203541.26599-1-joe@wand.net.nz>

This check will be reused by an upcoming commit for conditional jump
checks for sockets. Refactor it a bit to simplify the later commit.

Signed-off-by: Joe Stringer <joe@wand.net.nz>
Acked-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
---
 kernel/bpf/verifier.c | 43 +++++++++++++++++++++++++------------------
 1 file changed, 25 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
index 8b4e70eeced2..98b218bd46e8 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
@@ -249,6 +249,11 @@ static bool type_is_pkt_pointer(enum bpf_reg_type type)
 	       type == PTR_TO_PACKET_META;
 }
 
+static bool reg_type_may_be_null(enum bpf_reg_type type)
+{
+	return type == PTR_TO_MAP_VALUE_OR_NULL;
+}
+
 /* string representation of 'enum bpf_reg_type' */
 static const char * const reg_type_str[] = {
 	[NOT_INIT]		= "?",
@@ -3599,12 +3604,10 @@ static void reg_combine_min_max(struct bpf_reg_state *true_src,
 	}
 }
 
-static void mark_map_reg(struct bpf_reg_state *regs, u32 regno, u32 id,
-			 bool is_null)
+static void mark_ptr_or_null_reg(struct bpf_reg_state *reg, u32 id,
+				 bool is_null)
 {
-	struct bpf_reg_state *reg = &regs[regno];
-
-	if (reg->type == PTR_TO_MAP_VALUE_OR_NULL && reg->id == id) {
+	if (reg_type_may_be_null(reg->type) && reg->id == id) {
 		/* Old offset (both fixed and variable parts) should
 		 * have been known-zero, because we don't allow pointer
 		 * arithmetic on pointers that might be NULL.
@@ -3617,11 +3620,13 @@ static void mark_map_reg(struct bpf_reg_state *regs, u32 regno, u32 id,
 		}
 		if (is_null) {
 			reg->type = SCALAR_VALUE;
-		} else if (reg->map_ptr->inner_map_meta) {
-			reg->type = CONST_PTR_TO_MAP;
-			reg->map_ptr = reg->map_ptr->inner_map_meta;
-		} else {
-			reg->type = PTR_TO_MAP_VALUE;
+		} else if (reg->type == PTR_TO_MAP_VALUE_OR_NULL) {
+			if (reg->map_ptr->inner_map_meta) {
+				reg->type = CONST_PTR_TO_MAP;
+				reg->map_ptr = reg->map_ptr->inner_map_meta;
+			} else {
+				reg->type = PTR_TO_MAP_VALUE;
+			}
 		}
 		/* We don't need id from this point onwards anymore, thus we
 		 * should better reset it, so that state pruning has chances
@@ -3634,8 +3639,8 @@ static void mark_map_reg(struct bpf_reg_state *regs, u32 regno, u32 id,
 /* The logic is similar to find_good_pkt_pointers(), both could eventually
  * be folded together at some point.
  */
-static void mark_map_regs(struct bpf_verifier_state *vstate, u32 regno,
-			  bool is_null)
+static void mark_ptr_or_null_regs(struct bpf_verifier_state *vstate, u32 regno,
+				  bool is_null)
 {
 	struct bpf_func_state *state = vstate->frame[vstate->curframe];
 	struct bpf_reg_state *reg, *regs = state->regs;
@@ -3643,14 +3648,14 @@ static void mark_map_regs(struct bpf_verifier_state *vstate, u32 regno,
 	int i, j;
 
 	for (i = 0; i < MAX_BPF_REG; i++)
-		mark_map_reg(regs, i, id, is_null);
+		mark_ptr_or_null_reg(&regs[i], id, is_null);
 
 	for (j = 0; j <= vstate->curframe; j++) {
 		state = vstate->frame[j];
 		bpf_for_each_spilled_reg(i, state, reg) {
 			if (!reg)
 				continue;
-			mark_map_reg(&state->stack[i].spilled_ptr, 0, id, is_null);
+			mark_ptr_or_null_reg(reg, id, is_null);
 		}
 	}
 }
@@ -3852,12 +3857,14 @@ static int check_cond_jmp_op(struct bpf_verifier_env *env,
 	/* detect if R == 0 where R is returned from bpf_map_lookup_elem() */
 	if (BPF_SRC(insn->code) == BPF_K &&
 	    insn->imm == 0 && (opcode == BPF_JEQ || opcode == BPF_JNE) &&
-	    dst_reg->type == PTR_TO_MAP_VALUE_OR_NULL) {
-		/* Mark all identical map registers in each branch as either
+	    reg_type_may_be_null(dst_reg->type)) {
+		/* Mark all identical registers in each branch as either
 		 * safe or unknown depending R == 0 or R != 0 conditional.
 		 */
-		mark_map_regs(this_branch, insn->dst_reg, opcode == BPF_JNE);
-		mark_map_regs(other_branch, insn->dst_reg, opcode == BPF_JEQ);
+		mark_ptr_or_null_regs(this_branch, insn->dst_reg,
+				      opcode == BPF_JNE);
+		mark_ptr_or_null_regs(other_branch, insn->dst_reg,
+				      opcode == BPF_JEQ);
 	} else if (!try_match_pkt_pointers(insn, dst_reg, &regs[insn->src_reg],
 					   this_branch, other_branch) &&
 		   is_pointer_value(env, insn->dst_reg)) {
-- 
2.17.1

  parent reply	other threads:[~2018-10-03  3:21 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-10-02 20:35 [PATCHv4 bpf-next 00/13] Add socket lookup support Joe Stringer
2018-10-02 20:35 ` [PATCHv4 bpf-next 01/13] bpf: Add iterator for spilled registers Joe Stringer
2018-10-02 20:35 ` [PATCHv4 bpf-next 02/13] bpf: Simplify ptr_min_max_vals adjustment Joe Stringer
2018-10-02 20:35 ` [PATCHv4 bpf-next 03/13] bpf: Reuse canonical string formatter for ctx errs Joe Stringer
2018-10-02 20:35 ` Joe Stringer [this message]
2018-10-02 20:35 ` [PATCHv4 bpf-next 05/13] bpf: Add PTR_TO_SOCKET verifier type Joe Stringer
2018-10-02 20:35 ` [PATCHv4 bpf-next 06/13] bpf: Macrofy stack state copy Joe Stringer
2018-10-02 20:35 ` [PATCHv4 bpf-next 07/13] bpf: Add reference tracking to verifier Joe Stringer
2019-01-09  5:27   ` Alexei Starovoitov
2019-01-10 19:26     ` Joe Stringer
2018-10-02 20:35 ` [PATCHv4 bpf-next 08/13] bpf: Add helper to retrieve socket in BPF Joe Stringer
2018-10-02 20:35 ` [PATCHv4 bpf-next 09/13] selftests/bpf: Generalize dummy program types Joe Stringer
2018-10-02 20:35 ` [PATCHv4 bpf-next 10/13] selftests/bpf: Add tests for reference tracking Joe Stringer
2018-10-02 20:35 ` [PATCHv4 bpf-next 11/13] libbpf: Support loading individual progs Joe Stringer
2018-10-02 20:35 ` [PATCHv4 bpf-next 12/13] selftests/bpf: Add C tests for reference tracking Joe Stringer
2018-10-02 20:35 ` [PATCHv4 bpf-next 13/13] Documentation: Describe bpf " Joe Stringer
2018-10-03  1:08 ` [PATCHv4 bpf-next 00/13] Add socket lookup support Daniel Borkmann

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20181002203541.26599-5-joe@wand.net.nz \
    --to=joe@wand.net.nz \
    --cc=ast@kernel.org \
    --cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
    --cc=john.fastabend@gmail.com \
    --cc=kafai@fb.com \
    --cc=mauricio.vasquez@polito.it \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=nitin.hande@gmail.com \
    --cc=tgraf@suug.ch \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).