From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Stephen Hemminger Subject: Re: [PATCH iproute2] lib/libnetlink: fix response seq check Date: Wed, 3 Oct 2018 16:50:31 -0700 Message-ID: <20181003165031.24d3bdc6@xeon-e3> References: <20180928171339.4332-1-vlad@dumitrescu.ro> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: chrism@mellanox.com, Mahesh Bandewar , netdev@vger.kernel.org, Vlad Dumitrescu To: Vlad Dumitrescu Return-path: Received: from mail-pf1-f194.google.com ([209.85.210.194]:44190 "EHLO mail-pf1-f194.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1725799AbeJDGlI (ORCPT ); Thu, 4 Oct 2018 02:41:08 -0400 Received: by mail-pf1-f194.google.com with SMTP id r9-v6so2272895pff.11 for ; Wed, 03 Oct 2018 16:50:34 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Wed, 3 Oct 2018 16:01:40 -0700 Vlad Dumitrescu wrote: > Hi, > > On Fri, Sep 28, 2018 at 10:14 AM wrote: > > > > From: Vlad Dumitrescu > > > > Taking a one-iovec example, with rtnl->seq at 42. iovlen == 1, seq > > becomes 43 on line 604, and a message is sent with nlmsg_seq == 43. If > > a response with nlmsg_seq of 42 is received, the condition being fixed > > in this patch would incorrectly accept it. > > > > Fixes: 72a2ff3916e5 ("lib/libnetlink: Add a new function rtnl_talk_iov") > > Signed-off-by: Vlad Dumitrescu > > --- > > lib/libnetlink.c | 2 +- > > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > > > diff --git a/lib/libnetlink.c b/lib/libnetlink.c > > index f18dceac..4d2416bf 100644 > > --- a/lib/libnetlink.c > > +++ b/lib/libnetlink.c > > @@ -647,7 +647,7 @@ static int __rtnl_talk_iov(struct rtnl_handle *rtnl, struct iovec *iov, > > > > if (nladdr.nl_pid != 0 || > > h->nlmsg_pid != rtnl->local.nl_pid || > > - h->nlmsg_seq > seq || h->nlmsg_seq < seq - iovlen) { > > + h->nlmsg_seq > seq || h->nlmsg_seq < seq - iovlen + 1) { > > /* Don't forget to skip that message. */ > > status -= NLMSG_ALIGN(len); > > h = (struct nlmsghdr *)((char *)h + NLMSG_ALIGN(len)); > > -- > > 2.19.0.605.g01d371f741-goog > > Did anybody get a chance to review this? I'm not 100% sure I'm fixing > the right thing. > > Thanks, > Vlad Could you give an example where this failed. Better yet one of the tests.