From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Stanislaw Gruszka Subject: Re: [PATCH] net: wireless: iwlegacy: Fix possible data races in il4965_send_rxon_assoc() Date: Thu, 4 Oct 2018 09:59:15 +0200 Message-ID: <20181004075914.GB20523@redhat.com> References: <20181003140745.7650-1-baijiaju1990@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: kvalo@codeaurora.org, davem@davemloft.net, linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org To: Jia-Ju Bai Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20181003140745.7650-1-baijiaju1990@gmail.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org On Wed, Oct 03, 2018 at 10:07:45PM +0800, Jia-Ju Bai wrote: > These possible races are detected by a runtime testing. > To fix these races, the mutex lock is used in il4965_send_rxon_assoc() > to protect the data. Really ? I'm surprised by that, see below. > @@ -1297,6 +1297,7 @@ il4965_send_rxon_assoc(struct il_priv *il) > const struct il_rxon_cmd *rxon1 = &il->staging; > const struct il_rxon_cmd *rxon2 = &il->active; > > + mutex_lock(&il->mutex); > if (rxon1->flags == rxon2->flags && For 4965 driver il4965_send_rxon_assoc() is only called by il_mac_bss_info_changed() and il4965_commit_rxon(). il_mac_bss_info_changed() acquire il->mutex and callers of il4965_commit_rxon() acquire il->mutex (but I did not check all of them). So I wonder how this patch did not cause the deadlock ? Anyway what can be done is adding: lockdep_assert_held(&il->mutex); il4965_commit_rxon() to check if we hold the mutex. Thanks Stanislaw