From: Mike Manning <mmanning@vyatta.att-mail.com>
To: netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH net-next v3 2/9] net: ensure unbound stream socket to be chosen when not in a VRF
Date: Thu, 4 Oct 2018 16:12:07 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20181004151214.8522-3-mmanning@vyatta.att-mail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20181004151214.8522-1-mmanning@vyatta.att-mail.com>
The commit a04a480d4392 ("net: Require exact match for TCP socket
lookups if dif is l3mdev") only ensures that the correct socket is
selected for packets in a VRF. However, there is no guarantee that
the unbound socket will be selected for packets when not in a VRF.
By checking for a device match in compute_score() also for the case
when there is no bound device and attaching a score to this, the
unbound socket is selected. And if a failure is returned when there
is no device match, this ensures that bound sockets are never selected,
even if there is no unbound socket.
Signed-off-by: Mike Manning <mmanning@vyatta.att-mail.com>
---
include/net/inet_hashtables.h | 11 +++++++++++
include/net/inet_sock.h | 8 ++++++++
net/ipv4/inet_hashtables.c | 14 ++++++--------
net/ipv6/inet6_hashtables.c | 14 ++++++--------
4 files changed, 31 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/net/inet_hashtables.h b/include/net/inet_hashtables.h
index 4ae060b4bac2..5de2d9f24c05 100644
--- a/include/net/inet_hashtables.h
+++ b/include/net/inet_hashtables.h
@@ -189,6 +189,17 @@ static inline void inet_ehash_locks_free(struct inet_hashinfo *hashinfo)
hashinfo->ehash_locks = NULL;
}
+static inline bool inet_sk_bound_dev_eq(struct net *net, int bound_dev_if,
+ int dif, int sdif)
+{
+#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_NET_L3_MASTER_DEV)
+ return inet_bound_dev_eq(net->ipv4.sysctl_tcp_l3mdev_accept,
+ bound_dev_if, dif, sdif);
+#else
+ return inet_bound_dev_eq(1, bound_dev_if, dif, sdif);
+#endif
+}
+
struct inet_bind_bucket *
inet_bind_bucket_create(struct kmem_cache *cachep, struct net *net,
struct inet_bind_hashbucket *head,
diff --git a/include/net/inet_sock.h b/include/net/inet_sock.h
index 92e0aa3958f6..47c03ea989ad 100644
--- a/include/net/inet_sock.h
+++ b/include/net/inet_sock.h
@@ -143,6 +143,14 @@ static inline int inet_sk_bound_l3mdev(const struct sock *sk)
return 0;
}
+static inline bool inet_bound_dev_eq(bool l3mdev_accept, int bound_dev_if,
+ int dif, int sdif)
+{
+ if (!bound_dev_if)
+ return !sdif || l3mdev_accept;
+ return bound_dev_if == dif || bound_dev_if == sdif;
+}
+
static inline struct ip_options_rcu *ireq_opt_deref(const struct inet_request_sock *ireq)
{
return rcu_dereference_check(ireq->ireq_opt,
diff --git a/net/ipv4/inet_hashtables.c b/net/ipv4/inet_hashtables.c
index 260531dc6458..2ec684057ebd 100644
--- a/net/ipv4/inet_hashtables.c
+++ b/net/ipv4/inet_hashtables.c
@@ -235,6 +235,7 @@ static inline int compute_score(struct sock *sk, struct net *net,
{
int score = -1;
struct inet_sock *inet = inet_sk(sk);
+ bool dev_match;
if (net_eq(sock_net(sk), net) && inet->inet_num == hnum &&
!ipv6_only_sock(sk)) {
@@ -245,15 +246,12 @@ static inline int compute_score(struct sock *sk, struct net *net,
return -1;
score += 4;
}
- if (sk->sk_bound_dev_if || exact_dif) {
- bool dev_match = (sk->sk_bound_dev_if == dif ||
- sk->sk_bound_dev_if == sdif);
+ dev_match = inet_sk_bound_dev_eq(net, sk->sk_bound_dev_if,
+ dif, sdif);
+ if (!dev_match)
+ return -1;
+ score += 4;
- if (!dev_match)
- return -1;
- if (sk->sk_bound_dev_if)
- score += 4;
- }
if (sk->sk_incoming_cpu == raw_smp_processor_id())
score++;
}
diff --git a/net/ipv6/inet6_hashtables.c b/net/ipv6/inet6_hashtables.c
index 3d7c7460a0c5..5eeeba7181a1 100644
--- a/net/ipv6/inet6_hashtables.c
+++ b/net/ipv6/inet6_hashtables.c
@@ -99,6 +99,7 @@ static inline int compute_score(struct sock *sk, struct net *net,
const int dif, const int sdif, bool exact_dif)
{
int score = -1;
+ bool dev_match;
if (net_eq(sock_net(sk), net) && inet_sk(sk)->inet_num == hnum &&
sk->sk_family == PF_INET6) {
@@ -109,15 +110,12 @@ static inline int compute_score(struct sock *sk, struct net *net,
return -1;
score++;
}
- if (sk->sk_bound_dev_if || exact_dif) {
- bool dev_match = (sk->sk_bound_dev_if == dif ||
- sk->sk_bound_dev_if == sdif);
+ dev_match = inet_sk_bound_dev_eq(net, sk->sk_bound_dev_if,
+ dif, sdif);
+ if (!dev_match)
+ return -1;
+ score++;
- if (!dev_match)
- return -1;
- if (sk->sk_bound_dev_if)
- score++;
- }
if (sk->sk_incoming_cpu == raw_smp_processor_id())
score++;
}
--
2.11.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-10-04 22:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-10-04 15:12 [PATCH net-next v3 0/9] vrf: allow simultaneous service instances in default and other VRFs Mike Manning
2018-10-04 15:12 ` [PATCH net-next v3 1/9] net: allow binding socket in a VRF when there's an unbound socket Mike Manning
2018-10-04 15:12 ` Mike Manning [this message]
2018-10-04 15:12 ` [PATCH net-next v3 3/9] net: ensure unbound datagram socket to be chosen when not in a VRF Mike Manning
2018-10-04 15:12 ` [PATCH net-next v3 4/9] net: provide a sysctl raw_l3mdev_accept for raw socket lookup with VRFs Mike Manning
2018-10-04 15:12 ` [PATCH net-next v3 5/9] net: fix raw socket lookup device bind matching " Mike Manning
2018-10-04 15:12 ` [PATCH net-next v3 6/9] vrf: mark skb for multicast or link-local as enslaved to VRF Mike Manning
2018-10-04 15:12 ` [PATCH net-next v3 7/9] ipv6: allow ping to link-local address in VRF Mike Manning
2018-10-04 15:12 ` [PATCH net-next v3 8/9] ipv6: handling of multicast packets received " Mike Manning
2018-10-04 15:12 ` [PATCH net-next v3 9/9] ipv6: do not drop vrf udp multicast packets Mike Manning
2018-10-05 21:43 ` [PATCH net-next v3 0/9] vrf: allow simultaneous service instances in default and other VRFs David Miller
2018-10-05 23:49 ` David Ahern
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20181004151214.8522-3-mmanning@vyatta.att-mail.com \
--to=mmanning@vyatta.att-mail.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox