From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "John W. Linville" Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH ethtool] ethtool: better syntax for combinations of FEC modes Date: Thu, 4 Oct 2018 15:41:11 -0400 Message-ID: <20181004194110.GE8557@tuxdriver.com> References: <20180919144117.GF3876@unicorn.suse.cz> <20181001185909.GD3281@tuxdriver.com> <20181004140814.GB8557@tuxdriver.com> <046b3295-e634-f29e-5d3f-537d80cb3c30@solarflare.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Michal Kubecek , netdev To: Edward Cree Return-path: Received: from charlotte.tuxdriver.com ([70.61.120.58]:59887 "EHLO smtp.tuxdriver.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1727354AbeJECj6 (ORCPT ); Thu, 4 Oct 2018 22:39:58 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <046b3295-e634-f29e-5d3f-537d80cb3c30@solarflare.com> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Thu, Oct 04, 2018 at 05:06:29PM +0100, Edward Cree wrote: > On 04/10/18 15:08, John W. Linville wrote: > > Ping? > > > > On Mon, Oct 01, 2018 at 02:59:10PM -0400, John W. Linville wrote: > >> Is this patch still RFC? > Feel free to de-RFC and apply it. Great -- queued for next release. John -- John W. Linville Someday the world will need a hero, and you linville@tuxdriver.com might be all we have. Be ready.