From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] usbnet: smsc95xx: simplify tx_fixup code
Date: Fri, 05 Oct 2018 14:24:12 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <20181005.142412.601607260441380535.davem@davemloft.net>
References: <59988ed22559410881addfecf58335eb@AcuMS.aculab.com>
        <20181002165602.21033-1-ben.dooks@codethink.co.uk>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, David.Laight@ACULAB.COM, oneukum@suse.com,
        linux-usb@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@lists.codethink.co.uk
To: ben.dooks@codethink.co.uk
Return-path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
In-Reply-To: <20181002165602.21033-1-ben.dooks@codethink.co.uk>
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org

From: Ben Dooks <ben.dooks@codethink.co.uk>
Date: Tue,  2 Oct 2018 17:56:02 +0100

> -	memcpy(skb->data, &tx_cmd_a, 4);
> +	ptr = skb_push(skb, 8);
> +	tx_cmd_a = cpu_to_le32(tx_cmd_a);
> +	tx_cmd_b = cpu_to_le32(tx_cmd_b);
> +	memcpy(ptr, &tx_cmd_a, 4);
> +	memcpy(ptr+4, &tx_cmd_b, 4);

Even a memcpy() through a void pointer does not guarantee that gcc will
not emit word sized loads and stores.

You must use the get_unaligned()/put_unaligned() facilities to do this
properly.

I also agree that making a proper type and structure instead of using
a void pointer would be better.