From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] atm: nicstar: Replace spin_is_locked() with
 spin_trylock()
Date: Sat, 6 Oct 2018 09:59:47 -0700
Message-ID: <20181006165947.GQ2674@linux.ibm.com>
References: <20181004074657.17597-1-ldr709@gmail.com>
 <20181005.143236.511366748709139149.davem@davemloft.net>
Reply-To: paulmck@linux.ibm.com
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Cc: ldr709@gmail.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, 3chas3@gmail.com,
        linux-atm-general@lists.sourceforge.net, netdev@vger.kernel.org
To: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Return-path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20181005.143236.511366748709139149.davem@davemloft.net>
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org

On Fri, Oct 05, 2018 at 02:32:36PM -0700, David Miller wrote:
> From: Lance Roy <ldr709@gmail.com>
> Date: Thu,  4 Oct 2018 00:46:57 -0700
> 
> > ns_poll() used spin_is_locked() + spin_lock() to get achieve the same
> > thing as a spin_trylock(), so simplify it by using that instead. This is
> > also a step towards possibly removing spin_is_locked().
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Lance Roy <ldr709@gmail.com>
> 
> Applied to net-next.

Thank you, Dave!  I have dropped this one from my tree.

							Thanx, Paul