netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
To: jikos@kernel.org
Cc: yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org, pabeni@redhat.com, edumazet@google.com,
	netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] udp: Unbreak modules that rely on external __skb_recv_udp() availability
Date: Sun, 07 Oct 2018 20:34:21 -0700 (PDT)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20181007.203421.1496534902899406968.davem@davemloft.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <nycvar.YFH.7.76.1810041335180.14430@cbobk.fhfr.pm>

From: Jiri Kosina <jikos@kernel.org>
Date: Thu, 4 Oct 2018 13:37:32 +0200 (CEST)

> From: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@suse.cz>
> 
> Commit 2276f58ac589 ("udp: use a separate rx queue for packet reception")
> turned static inline __skb_recv_udp() from being a trivial helper around
> __skb_recv_datagram() into a UDP specific implementaion, making it
> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL() at the same time.
> 
> There are external modules that got broken by __skb_recv_udp() not being
> visible to them. Let's unbreak them by making __skb_recv_udp EXPORT_SYMBOL().
> 
> Rationale (one of those) why this is actually "technically correct" thing 
> to do: __skb_recv_udp() used to be an inline wrapper around 
> __skb_recv_datagram(), which itself (still, and correctly so, I believe) 
> is EXPORT_SYMBOL().
> 
> Cc: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>
> Cc: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
> Fixes: 2276f58ac589 ("udp: use a separate rx queue for packet reception")
> Signed-off-by: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@suse.cz>

Applied...

But waiting from 4.13 until now to bring this up is really pushing it...

  reply	other threads:[~2018-10-08  3:34 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-10-04 11:37 [PATCH] udp: Unbreak modules that rely on external __skb_recv_udp() availability Jiri Kosina
2018-10-08  3:34 ` David Miller [this message]
2018-10-08  5:15   ` Jiri Kosina

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20181007.203421.1496534902899406968.davem@davemloft.net \
    --to=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=jikos@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
    --cc=yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).