From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Richard Cochran Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 net-next 2/5] net: Introduce a new MII time stamping interface. Date: Sun, 7 Oct 2018 19:04:39 -0700 Message-ID: <20181008020439.m2cytnnv5ue7yc5l@localhost> References: <20181007173823.21590-3-richardcochran@gmail.com> <20181007182751.GC22794@lunn.ch> <20181007191551.gy4l4g6qdgz6ztez@localhost> <20181007195400.GA25883@lunn.ch> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, David Miller , Florian Fainelli , Jacob Keller , Mark Rutland , Miroslav Lichvar , Rob Herring , Willem de Bruijn To: Andrew Lunn Return-path: Received: from mail-pg1-f194.google.com ([209.85.215.194]:38949 "EHLO mail-pg1-f194.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1725760AbeJHJN7 (ORCPT ); Mon, 8 Oct 2018 05:13:59 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20181007195400.GA25883@lunn.ch> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Sun, Oct 07, 2018 at 09:54:00PM +0200, Andrew Lunn wrote: > Sure, but things have moved on since then. I was curious about this. Based on your uses cases, I guess that you mean phylib? But not much has changed AFAICT. (There is one new global function and two were removed, but that doesn't change the picture WRT time stamping.) Phylink now has two or three new users, one of which is dsa. Is that the big move? The situation with MACs that handle their own PHYs without phylib is unchanged, AFAICT. So what exactly do you mean? Thanks, Richard